Thursday, August 31, 2006

Network News...

Just got this by email:
PHCS to be sold to MultiPlan
Today, Assurant Health, along with Guardian and Trustmark, the majority owners of Private Health Care Systems (PHCS), announced that we have reached an agreement to sell our interests in PHCS to MultiPlan, Inc.
Assurant Health simultaneously entered into a long-term agreement to enable our customers to continue to have access to PHCS PPO Network providers. That means business will continue normally with no interruption or change for our insureds or agents...
PHCS will be owned and managed by MultiPlan, a leading independent network of heathcare providers. We believe the combined strength of MultiPlan and PHCS will lead to stronger and more diverse networks, which will enhance customer access to providers - and that the agreement is in the best interests of all our stakeholders.
It seems to indicate that folks whose health care plans (and "discount" cards) utilize the PHCS network will have access to more providers. It's also possible [NOTE: rampant, baseless speculation follows] that MP will increase their network access fees (to recoup acquisition costs), which could lead to rate increases.
Frankly, though, I'm not really sure what it means.
Stay tuned.

The Night the Lights Went Out in Georgia

After a rocky three-month start-up, Georgia's Medicaid and PeachCare overhaul goes statewide Friday, with hundreds of thousands of patients joining HMOs.

Many physicians have cited payment and patient-care problems experienced when the managed care program started in metro Atlanta and central Georgia in June, and they fear they will surface as the program expands this week. Several doctors said many families still have not received their ID cards for the new program, confusing patients.


In an attempt to shore up a money losing operation, the state opted to allow tighter managed care for their Medicaid program. Based on what has occurred so far it does not appear to be working.

On Wednesday, the state said the total number of people joining HMOs statewide could be one-fourth fewer than expected, in part because the state began checking citizenship and income of beneficiaries on Jan. 1. The total number of people joining HMOs statewide will be 847,000, not 1.2 million as was originally projected, officials said

Note the operative phrase here . . .” began checking citizenship and income of beneficiaries”

Does this mean there were almost 400,000 people receiving free health care that were not eligible?

Kind of put’s a dent in the argument that the private health care system is wasteful. Having 400,000 more people than are truly QUALIFIED is almost a 50% overcharge.

Keep in mind this is TAXPAYER money, not the government.

The government doesn’t have any money.

MCG Health, an Augusta hospital system and leading Medicaid provider, told state officials Tuesday that it would not accept nonemergency Medicaid patients because it had not reached a contract with two HMOs serving that area. Staff members have started canceling patient appointments scheduled for Friday

Fewer Medicaid recipients AND fewer providers willing to see them.

I see a train wreck waiting to happen.

The HMO transition follows years of a traditional system of care in which Medicaid patients were allowed to go to whichever doctor would serve them. But after years of double-digit percentage increases in Medicaid costs, Perdue's administration opted to switch to HMOs, which have a reputation for tighter financial controls.

“Double-digit percentage increases”.

Even Medicaid, with it’s tight fisted tactics could not make a dent in controlling medical care inflation.

Since the start-up, though, physicians have complained that the state's three HMOs have delayed paying them millions of dollars for medical care. This month, a group of Georgia physicians filed suit against the private companies running the Medicaid HMOs, claiming these firms owe millions in outstanding claims to medical providers. The suit alleges the plaintiffs have had to lay off employees and cut back on providing services to low-income residents.

Some patients have also had trouble getting their regular medications and have experienced delays in receiving needed care, medical providers say.

When providers are scheduled to be reimbursed for care at a lower rate, and they are not paid at all, this is a disaster waiting to happen.

The state is counting on a projected $80 million in first-year savings from the initiative. In addition, experts say some doctors and other providers may end up dropping out of Medicaid because of problems, making access to care more difficult for poor patients, possibly pushing them into already overcrowded hospital emergency rooms for routine care.


Wonder how much of that $80M is due to kicking folks off the Medicaid role that never belonged there?

Dr. Adrienne Butler, a Waycross pediatrician, said she retired earlier this month. The upcoming Medicaid transition was "the last straw" for her.

Butler, 59, said she was already losing income, with Medicaid patients being about 80 percent of her practice. "There are families who don't know what [HMO] they're in," Butler said. "The frustration is really high."


This may not be another Tenncare but it could be a close second.

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

No Sperm For You

[UPDATE: Greetings, Jenn's Journal readers! Please feel free to take a look around]

The British Fertility Society is recommending women with a body mass index of 36 and over should not be allowed access to fertility treatment.

Underweight women and those classed just as obese (BMI over 29) should be forced to address their weight before starting treatment, the society said.

Scooped again!

Joe Kristan, blogging at Roth & Co, has news that one large insurer is making it easier (and cheaper) for employers to set up HSA's.

Helpful info.

GoldenCare...

Back in April, Bob alerted us to California's bill SB 840, which would establish a single-payor, "universal" style health care system in the state. Then, earlier this month, he had an update on the bill, and emphasized that "(t)he bill provides nothing. The taxpayers provide the coverage."
Well, the bill has now been passed by the California assembly (it was previously approved by the state senate), and awaits only a few modifications before it heads to The Governator for signature. Or not.
As it stands, the bill would eliminate "regular" insurance plans (group and individual), replacing them with a state-run plan (i.e. expensive, inefficient, tax-gobbling bureaucracy). This will not, of course, affect ERISA plans (which are federally regulated), or (as Bob points out in the comments) public entities. In fact, it may be a boon to the self-funded industry, as employers look for ways to avoid this train wreck.
On the other hand, I'm actually glad to see this effort unfolding in this way. As a 10th amendment supporter, this seems to me the appropriate venue. That is, there is nothing in the Constitution giving the Federal Government the power to commandeer 1/7th of our economy. But "the 10th" reserves such endeavors to the individual states. If it's true that folks vote with their feet (and, of course, their wallets), this new program will be a terrific test of whether or not we're ready for government run health care for all.
How's that ancient Chinese curse go? "May you live in interesting times."
Indeed.

Et Tu, Ken?

Gee, where have we seen this before?
In fairness, it doesn't look as draconian as the Mass plan (for example, those currently covered under an employer-sponsored group plan would keep that coverage). Because state law requires ER's to treat even the uninsured, that's their first (and often last) stop. Emergency care, though, is the most expensive care in the current system, which further drives up the cost of health care delivery.
As one of our astute commenters has noted, however, "the symptom is not the problem. The problem is the high total cost of health care." He concludes "that tinkering with insurance mechanisms does nothing to address the underlying cost of health care." It's not clear that this initiative will do much (if anything) to address that issue.
Of course, funding for this new program is still "nebulous" (from the Latin nebu, meaning "ripped from" and elous meaning "taxpayers wallets"). We'll keep an eye on this, and let our readers know whether or not it gains any traction here in the Buckeye State.

Latest Cavalcade...

Cavalcade of Risk, that is. Fellow Daytonian Kristin McAllister, hostess of Making Cents, hosts this week's edition of the C of R. She's done an outstanding job, not just organizing all the posts into categories, but by including extensive summaries and even snippets of each one. Kudos, Kristin!
If you're using your cell phone on the road (and who isn't), you'll want to read this post from previous C of R host Julie Ferguson. Writing at Workers Comp Insider, she identifies the problem of work-related cell phone use and employer liability. Kinda scary.

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

New Criteria

A 79-year-old Norwegian woman says she was denied a driver's license when she couldn't identify the Swedish prime minister or beat her doctor at arm wrestling.

The woman, who later called the doctor "a very unusual man," got her license renewed after appealing to the Norwegian Public Roads Administration and seeing another doctor, the newspaper Oppland Arbeiderblad reported.

The second doctor put her through a more conventional check-up of eyesight, blood pressure and some routine questions.

"First he asked me who the prime minister of Denmark was," the woman told Oppland Arbeiderblad about the first doctor. "Then I said that I wasn't interested in politics and I didn't know, so he asked me if I knew who the prime minister of Sweden was, and I gave him the same answer."

The woman said she worries that most of the people who hear her story find it funny because she has heard similar complaints about the doctor.



Come to think of it, I have no idea who the PM of Denmark is either . . . or Sweden.

The Dirty Side of Universal Health Care

A national health-care system may be the Holy Grail of American liberalism. If only the government managed medicine, the argument goes, costs could be restrained, quality assured and access extended from the poshest beach house to the humblest shotgun shack

But is there a downside?

It would be bad enough if national health care merely offered patients low-quality treatment. Even worse, Ridenour finds, it kills them.
• Breast cancer is fatal to 25 percent of its American victims. In Great Britain and New Zealand, both socialized-medicine havens, breast cancer kills 46 percent of women it strikes.
• Prostate cancer proves fatal to 19 percent of its American sufferers. In single-payer Canada, the National Center for Policy Analysis reports, this ailment kills 25 percent of such men and eradicates 57 percent of their British counterparts.
• After major surgery, a 2003 British study found, 2.5 percent of American patients died in the hospital versus nearly 10 percent of similar Britons. Seriously ill U.S. hospital patients die at one-seventh the pace of those in the U.K.
• "In usual circumstances, people over age 75 should not be accepted" for treatment of end-state renal failure, according to New Zealand's official guidelines. Unfortunately, for older Kiwis, government controls kidney dialysis.
• According to a Populus survey, 98 percent of Britons want to reduce the time between diagnosis and treatment.


Why don’t we ever hear about these stats?

OK, now you have . . .

Monday, August 28, 2006

Fetch

Fetch, Inc. today announced the launch of Petplan Insurance in the United States. Petplan, operated under license by Fetch, Inc. and underwritten by American National Property And Casualty Company, rated A+ (Superior) by AM Best, is the world's leading pet health insurance brand, recommended by more veterinarians, pet owners and pedigree pet breeders than any other.

Medi-Pet anyone?

Or how about Pet-icare?

A Rainy Money Monday...

The bad news is, it's gray, wet and ugly here in southwestern Ohio this morning. The good news is that Frugal at My 1st Million (at 33!) is hosting this week's edition of the Carnival of Personal Finance. He's collected, collated, and organized almost 50 submissions. Great job!
Mapgirl has a helpful post on how to maximize your doctor's visit. Some is just common sense, of course, but since when is that a bad thing? Seriously, a useful post, check it out.
And clocking in with just shy of 40 posts, the Carnival of the Capitalists is now up, over at Business & Technology Reinvention blog. I like how cleanly and simply it's laid out, with brief summaries of each submission. Well done!
Blogger Vihar Sheth has a thought-provoking post at his Green Rising blog. He discusses a survey of cultures, from all over the worls, and how each one looks at individualism, isolation, long term orientation, and other cultural attributes. Interesting.

Sunday, August 27, 2006

A Tale of Two Choices

eHealthinsurance is out with its annual report of what premiums are in different cities and they’re still comparing the price of rotten month old apples with sweet juicy, juicy mangoes. And amazingly enough they’re different.

Lies, damn lies & statistics.

Choose your poison.

Of course in practical terms this report is useless. I’m a great example in that I applied for two identical policies from different carriers on eHealthinsurance—both quotes about $100 a month for a $2500 deductible plan. But when the underwriting was done, one was still $100 a month and the other wouldn’t take me at all and suggested I went in the guaranteed issue pool at $400 a month for a $4000 deductible. So quoting price without knowing what the individuals concerned need to go through to get the insurance and therefore knowing the actual price is useless.

This has been said before but it definitely bears repeating.

Rates mean nothing unless you know what the final offer will be.

Insurance Dispatch

This week's column is up at The Medical Blog Network. We revisit the issue of network discounts (or lack thereof) for non-covered services.

Saturday, August 26, 2006

All or Nothing...

Justin, host of HealthFlux, has a terrific post up about how folks' perception of how health insurance should work is changing (or should be changing). He takes to task those who ask if "they can't have the best without having to pay for the best why settle for anything less?"

Read the whole thing.

Heavy Debt

Most Kansas farm families have health insurance but carry heavy loads of medical debt anyway.

Farming is no longer a small business. With the amount of capital tied up in land & machinery, a wise farmer will purchase insurance to protect those assets.

The study found about 95 percent of Kansas farmers buy medical insurance -- but most of those get only minimal or catastrophic health coverage. That leaves them bearing the costs of most illnesses or accidents themselves

95% is much higher than the general population. They are to be commended. And cat cover is what everyone should buy. We don't have copay's for oil changes, tires or gasoline for our automobile. Why do we think we need copays for routine items like doctor visits?

Ninety percent reported owing money to their doctors, with nearly that percentage owing money to hospitals. About two-thirds had outstanding prescription costs, while slightly over half had bills with dentists.

Most people think hospital bills will wreck you financially. Fact is, about 40% of claim dollars paid by carriers is for hospital bills. That leaves another 60% for outpatient care such as doctors & Rx costs.

Total debts varied widely, with the median about $2,500.

When did $2500 become classified as a "heavy debt"??

Friday, August 25, 2006

Cavalcade #7 - Submissions Due

Submissions for next week's C of R (which will be at Making Cents blog) are due by this coming Monday, Aug 28. You can enter your submissions:
■ via email
or
■ at Ferdy's
Thanks!

For the Children...

Now this is interesting: according to a new study conducted by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a number of state-sponsored initiatives seem to be working. These plans, which offer basic (and sometimes better) health plans to uninsured kids, have had limited success, because (frankly) so few folks take advantage of them.
Apprently, though, that's changing: "State programs that provide health coverage for poor children are working, with the number of uninsured youngsters declining by more than 20 percent between 1997 and 2004," numbers based on the aforementioned RWJF study. The study also determined that there are about 8 million children still without insurance (although I have some problems with this number, I'll stipulate it for the purposes of this post. Of these, some 5.5 million are eligible for one of these state-backed plans.
I'm a bit bothered about one item in particular: the study claims that while there's a 31% increase in the number of 'kinder' enrolled in public programs, there's also a 5% decline in children being insured through private coverage. So parents, who should be paying for this, are foisting off their progeny onto us taxpayers. I'm not all that pleased with this particular development. As it stands, more kids are being covered (which is a good thing), but more of them are being covered on your nickel (which may not be).

Large Popcorn Please, Hold the Butter

A factory worker who claimed his lungs were ruined as a result of mixing flavoring oils used in microwave popcorn was awarded $20 million by a jury Monday.

Eric Peoples was the first of 30 former workers at the Gilster-Mary Lee Corp. plant in Jasper to have his suit heard against the two makers of the butter flavoring. Following a morning of closing arguments, the jury deliberated for a little more than three hours before returning the verdict.

People cried and hugged his wife, Cassandra, as the jury ruled against International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. and its subsidiary Bush Boake Allen Inc., the manufacturers of the flavoring. They were ordered to pay $18 million to Eric Peoples and $2 million to his wife for compensatory personal injury damages.

Thursday, August 24, 2006

A Wonky Review

This week's Health Wonk Review is up, hosted by The Lucidicus Project. Boasting an even dozen entries, our host has each one with a summary and context. Bravo!
A few weeks ago, our own Bob Vineyard offered an obit on California's PacAdvantage Program. In this week's HWR, Jason Shafrin (writing at the Health Care Economist) picks up the torch.

Stay Tuned

Pennsylvania's first hearing on whether to require everyone to have health insurance hinted at the potential for a fight ahead.

The debate will involve financially powerful players such as insurers, health care providers and businesses, whose interests often are at odds. The issue surfaced after Massachusetts passed a law earlier this year requiring residents to have insurance.

The National Federation of Independent Businesses also offered an unenthusiastic view of the Massachusetts plan.

Such a plan could add $150 million to the cost of doing business for Pennsylvania companies and worsen an already bad business climate, said Mark Richards, assistant state director for the federation.

Smart HSA

Patients covered by UnitedHealth Group will soon receive patient identification cards that they can use as debit cards for medical expenses and that doctors can use to access patients' personal health information electronically

The new cards, which will carry the MasterCard logo, can be swiped like a credit card at a doctors' office or other certified health provider. But in addition to providing payment, the cards can be used to confirm eligibility for services and provide access to personal health information at the point of care. The cards should be broadly available early in 2007.

UnitedHealth is working on a feature that uses the cards to interface with its electronic systems and determine precisely how much the patient owes at the time of the doctor visit. Besides collecting copayments and other patient-billable expenses easily, doctors' offices can use the cards to submit and process insurance claims more quickly, says UnitedHealth.

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Here's the Beef...

According to a new survey, more than half of the employers who responded have enhanced employee benefits in the past 6 months. Of those, almost 9 out of 10 added some kind (or kinds) of health-related benefits. About 40% increased paid vacation days, and about a third added some kind of flex-hour or job-sharing deal.

Some two-thirds of those surveyed indicated that they had added some kind of financial incentive, such as increased pension matches, as well.

Called "pragmatic benefits," the emphasis is on offering things that are more lifestyle related, not just "show me the money."

Interesting.

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

Paying More, Getting Less

Years ago, when cigarettes were advertised on TV there was a commercial for a certain brand that asked the question.

“Are you smoking more and enjoying it less?”

That phrase can be re-worked and applied to health insurance as well.

Are you paying MORE for health insurance and getting less?

If you are like most people, the answer is yes.

Family of 4, mid 30’s in greater Atlanta. They want a plan with all the bells & whistles with low copays & low deductible.

OK, so how about $25 copays and a $500 deductible?

Outstanding! Just what they want.

Premium is $751 per month.

So what are they getting for their $751?

Unlimited doc visits at $25 each. Generic drugs covered with a $15 copay. Rx deductible of $100 for brand name only, then $30 or $60 copay. Other charges subject to a $500 deductible then 80% of the next $10,000. Out of pocket on a major claim is $2500 + copays.

All this for only $751 per month.

What happens when you eliminate the copays and discount the professional services? You raise the deductible to $2500 but pay 100% after the deductible. Your out of pocket on a major claim is now $2500. That’s it. Not $2500 PLUS copays, just $2500.

And the new premium is . . . $290 per month.

That is a savings of $461 per month. Over $5500 per year.

In most households that will pay for a lot of doctor visits & meds.

Nothing wrong with the copay plan as long as you understand you are paying more but getting less for your dollar.

Grand Rounds...

The 100th edition of Grand Rounds may be found at Dr Charles' blog. This is an especially rich version, with some 55 entries, all categorized and summarized.

Loose Ends...

As in, tying 'em up:
■ First, in What a Tangled Web, we learned that United HealthCare had been a little too vigorous in its compensation to Columbus (OH) insurance agent Kevin Grady. At the time, UHC got a stiff slap on the wrist, and we wondered what might become of Mr G.
Well, now we know. Thanks to alert IB reader Pete D, we learn that:
■ Following up on Part 2 of our Tangled Web series, which again involved those frisky folks at UHC, this time with a fellow named Fritz Neuhart, who allegedly double-dipped his carrier and his clients:
The extra twist here is that the case has widened to include another carrier, Medical Mutual of Ohio. Of course, we're all innocent until proven guilty. We'll continue to monitor both these cases.
■ Finally, in case you've forgotten about our own ground-breaking series on HSA's and network discounts, I received an answer (of sorts) from another carrier yesterday. To their credit, Anthem did get back to me, confirming that it follows industry practice: their network contracts allow providers to determine whether or not to discount non-covered services.

Monday, August 21, 2006

Foolish Pride

Recently I posted about a rather large claim involving a family friend. An auto accident had injured a young girl and her bills at that time were $680,000 and counting.

Today I talked to a man who was looking for coverage to replace his current plan. He now has a $10,000 deductible with another $5,000 out of pocket on a major claim. His premium is increasing, unjustly in his mind, and he feels he can do better.

He also feels he does not need an agent to advise him.

He told me he found a plan that was about $40 per month less expensive than his current plan, and had a $2500 deductible.

For some reason, this did not seem odd.

He wanted to know if I could offer anything better.

Of course I can.

I can offer a policy that will cover more than is covered now, and considerably more than the plan he thinks he wants, for somewhere in between his current premium and the one he has found.

On a $680,000 claim his current plan will pay all but $15,000.

The plan he has found will stop after paying $100,000.

And he thinks he doesn't need an agent . . .

BS 840

If passed, and signed by the governor, SB840 will provide comprehensive, high quality health insurance for all Californians.

The bill provides nothing. The taxpayers provide the coverage. BS 840 will actually LOWER the standard of care for residents.

Incredibly, nearly 7 million Californians lack health insurance during all or part of the year. Roughly 70 percent of these people are employed but do not receive employer-based insurance.

Apparently there is no expectation of personal responsibilty in California. If your employer, or the taxpayer, does not provide it then you will have to do without.

In California, with the sixth-largest economy in the world, it is past time to offer our citizens what so many other nations offer, universal single payer coverage for all Californians.

If/when BS 840 passes, expect fewer providers to accept the universal insurance. Fewer providers means more rationing and higher prices for those who choose not to use the taxpayer funded plans.

It's Money Time!

With over 50 posts, the folks at Carnival of Personal Finance. Done in the style of Dr Suess, it's well-organized AND fun!
I've never understood the value of AD&D (Accidental Death and Dismemberment) plans. So I was pleased to see that I'm not alone: Five Cent Nickel expresses the same doubts.

Sunday, August 20, 2006

Insurance Dispatch

This week's column is up. We discuss how so-called medical discount cards can be a boon, or a big bad bust.
Unfortunately, unscrupulous salesfolk and anxious consumers make for a bad combination.

Saturday, August 19, 2006

Taxes . . .

Nearly 850,000 Hoosiers are uninsured, and Indiana administrators are trying to find a solution.

One visited Terre Haute today looking for a remedy to the state`s health insurance crisis.

Jeanne Labrecque, a representative from the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, came to Ivy Tech for a town hall meeting.

The administration is looking to find a solution to the complicated and growing problem of health insurance.

One way they might do that is by raising cigarette taxes.


Tax smokers to pay for health insurance for those who are without. Does one have to PROVE they are unable to buy health insurance before they will qualify (assuming this passes)? Will just anyone be able to drop coverage and pick up the free coverage courtesy of the smokers in the state?

Novel idea.

So where does it go from here?

Taxing expensive foreign cars so poor people can have a nicer car too.

How about 4 star restaurants so the fast food crowd can have a nice meal too?

Tax the birth control products so old guys can have free Viagra.

Can't wait.

Better Late...

I'm baaaack!
And so's the Cavalcade of Risk, graciously hosted by Tim of My Money Forest. Please stop by and check it out.

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

Cost of Delay

There is a cost to everything. Sometimes prices are stable. Other times prices rise. Once in a while prices drop.

The premium charged for health insurance, particularly individual health insurance, is not the only factor affecting affordability.

More often than not, the one factor that most fail to account for is their health.

Your health can change from one day to the next.

Here are a few examples.

Don was considering leaving his job and striking out on his own. He started looking at plans but figured he had time and could afford to wait.

Don left his job last month. He is still trying to decide. Last week he visited the doctor for a routine physical. Turns out his cholestorol reading was 350.

He was immediately put on cholesterol lowering meds.

Now when Don applies for health insurance his premium will be 20 - 45% higher or he may find that the carrier will refuse to cover any treatment for high cholesterol and any related illness.

The cost of waiting as it turns out is quite high.

Karen started looking in January. She was on COBRA which was due to run out in August. No rush. She could have made a change in January and saved about $100 per month over her COBRA coverage. She could even have a carrier that will cover her cholesterol treatment.

Karen chose to wait.

In April she had surgery to remove a kidney stone. All is fine now.

Except her search for coverage has changed dramatically.

The carrier who would accept her before without restriction on cholesterol treatment now refuses to offer a policy.

Every other carrier she will consider will not cover kidney stones for a minimum of 2 years.

She does have a conversion option. The premium for conversion is $900 per month.

The plan she wanted in January was $250 per month.

Her kidney stone operation was $15,000. Now when she takes a policy she will have to hope she doesn't have additional problems with kidney stones.

Karen's decision to wait could cost her plenty.

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

SB 840, Health Care for All

Sounds great doesn't it? Unrestricted health care for all.

There is a movement going on in several state, most notably the states that lean to the left, to provider some form of universal health care. One of the plans at the forefront is California's SB 840.

Here are some excerpts . . .

Not just junk insurance, but full care for all.

Health Security with full benefits for LIFE


Now who wouldn't want that? FULL care (no out of pocket), for ALL residents (including illegals), for life (from cradle to grave).

Free choice of any primary care doctor

Wow! Any doc. No networks. Docs are allowed to charge whatever they want and 840 will pay for it.

Who says there is no free lunch?

All care needed including hospital, emergency, prescription drugs, dental, vision & more.

A Socialist's dream. Free everything.

No copays or deductibles for at least 2 years.

Then what happens after 2 years?

Efficient administration cuts costs 25%

No one says HOW they will cut admin costs by that much, but even if they do, what happens once the admin savings have been overtaken by medical inflation? About 2 years out any admin savings is a wash and you are back to the same issues you have now.

I thought the Massachusetts plan was silly. This puts them to shame.

Late addition . . .

It seems the Gentle Cricket has also been keeping an eye on this legislation. I invite you to read his take on SB 840 here.

Monday, August 14, 2006

EMTALA and You

Don’t have health insurance? EMTALA is a law you need to know.

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act is a statute which governs when and how a patient may be (1) refused treatment or (2) transferred from one hospital to another when he is in an unstable medical condition.

EMTALA applies only to "participating hospitals" -- i.e., to hospitals which have entered into "provider agreements" under which they will accept payment from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) under the Medicare program for services provided to beneficiaries of that program. In practical terms, this means that it applies to virtually all hospitals in the U.S., with the exception of the Shriners' Hospital for Crippled Children and many military hospitals. Its provisions apply to all patients, and not just to Medicare patients.

The avowed purpose of the statute is to prevent hospitals from rejecting patients, refusing to treat them, or transferring them to "charity hospitals" or "county hospitals" because they are unable to pay or are covered under the Medicare or Medicaid programs.

EMTALA is primarily but not exclusively a non-discrimination statute. One would cover most of its purpose and effect by characterizing it as providing that no patient who presents with an emergency medical condition and who is unable to pay may be treated differently than patients who are covered by health insurance.


Any patient who "comes to the emergency department" requesting "examination or treatment for a medical condition" must be provided with "an appropriate medical screening examination" to determine if he is suffering from an "emergency medical condition". If he is, then the hospital is obligated to either provide him with treatment until he is stable or to transfer him to another hospital in conformance with the statute's directives.

Note the use of the words “emergency medical condition” and “treatment until he is stable”. If a true emergency situation does not exist, the provider is not obligated to provide treatment. Once the patient is stabilized there is no further obligation to treat the patient.

So when is the patient stabilized?

• (for emergency medical conditions) that no material deterioration of the patient's condition is likely to result from the transfer or is likely to occur during the transfer;
• (for patients in active labor) the infant and the placenta have been delivered.


And what if the patient lacks the ability to pay? Can the hospital (or doctor) ask if the patient has the ability to pay?

Yes, but timing is everything. The statute does not prohibit an inquiry into availability of medical insurance; it does provide that neither examination nor treatment may be delayed to make the inquiry.

Some knowledgeable commentators have suggested that no discussion of any payment issues should take place before the medical screening examination and any needed stabilizing treatment are provided. Others have found no reason for an outright prohibition on asking about insurance coverage while the patient is waiting for the examination so long as it is made clear that financial considerations will not affect decisions regarding examination and treatment. This is obviously an area with some dangers, and one benefit of absolute rules is that no one has to wonder where the line may be drawn. CMS has even recommended that hospital personnel not answer any questions initiated by the patient, apparently on the theory that some patients may be dissuaded from staying if they learn that they will be financially responsible for the treatment, even if they are assured that they will be seen without consideration of payment issues.



I find this disturbing. “Some patients may be dissuaded from staying if the learn they will be financially responsible for treatment”.

What kind of people feel that medical treatment is, or should be, free?

So what happens if a patient feels they have been discharged early, or have not been treated fairly?

A hospital which negligently violates the statute may be subject to a civil money penalty (i.e., a fine, but without criminal implications) of up to $50,000 per violation. If the hospital has fewer than 100 beds, the maximum penalty is $25,000 per violation.

A physician who is responsible for providing an examination or treatment, including but not limited to an on-call physician, may be liable for a civil money penalty for signing the medical certificate if he knew or should have known that the benefits of transfer did not in fact outweigh the risks of transfer, or if he misrepresents the patient's condition or the hospital's obligations under the statute.

A physician who is on call and who fails or refuses to appear after being called by an E.R. physician (or other physician) may be subject to a penalty under the statute, or may subject his hospital to a penalty. The wording of this section [1395dd(d)(1)(C)] is so garbled as to be virtually indecipherable


In other words, they can be sued.

So to summarize . . .

If you have a medical emergency, you have a right to treatment regardless of your ability to pay. Once your condition has been stabilized you can be discharged or transferred to another facility for care. If you feel the hospital or staff has acted inappropriately in discharging you, they may be sued.

What a country.

Your Money Monday

Franky, blogging at the eponymously-named Frank the Financially Savvy Atheist, hosts this week's Carnival of Personal Finance. There are over 20 posts, a half dozen of which he highlighted as stand-outs.

My favorite was this thoughtful item at Tore O's Money Matador. Ever wondered if beggars *can* be choosers?

Barry Moltz hosts this week's Carnival of the Capitalists. With over 30 posts to organize, he's done a great job.

One of my favorite bumper stickers is "The Paperless Office is as likely as the Paperless Bathroom," so I really liked this post from Pocket Change.

Sunday, August 13, 2006

PacAdvantage Closing

Pacific Health Advantage, or PacAdvantage, said Friday that it will stop its pooled health insurance coverage to 6,200 small businesses in California at the end of the year because of the withdrawal of health plan providers from the program.

The problem was not the withdrawal of PROVIDERS, but rather CARRIERS from the program. Blue Cross of California did not find the program to be economically feasible and withdrew.

Created as the Health Insurance Plan of California by the state in 1992 and taken over in 1998 by Pacific Business Group on Health, PacAdvantage is an independent, non-profit purchasing pool for small businesses with between 2 and 50 employees. It was intended to make health insurance more available and affordable and to ensure a choice of health plans for employees of small businesses.

In other words, this was an association plan that has been hailed as a solution to rising health care costs. Association plans are also known as MEWA’s.

At its peak, in 2002, its membership stood at 9,000 employers and 147,000 employees. But participation from insurers was voluntary, and under the weight of increasing health care costs and other unfavorable market pressures, they bailed out one after the other, Grgurina said

Current enrollment now stands at 116,000 covered participants; more than a 20% drop from the high enrollment.

Several things were inherently wrong and doomed the plan almost from the first.

The plan targeted small employers with 2 – 50 employees.

The plan was guaranteed issue. ANYONE can be covered, regardless of prior health history.

These two items alone are not enough to sink the plan but the next item appears to be a major flaw that pulled down the plan.

Each employee was allowed to pick their own plan. This is a key component that led to adverse selection.

When claims continue to rise faster than premiums, more carriers pull out of the plan. The more premiums rise, the more adverse selection there is which puts even more pressure on loss ratio’s. When there are not enough bodies & premium to support the risk the plan implodes.

Insurance Dispatch

This week's column is up, over at The Medical Blog Network.

Did you know that you can pay for Long Term Care insurance (LTCi) out of an HSA? It’s true, and it might be a good idea. Read all about it.

Saturday, August 12, 2006

Here We Go Again . . .

Democratic state lawmakers are embracing the one solution to spiraling health care costs that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger says he has ruled out: eliminating private insurance plans in favor of a single-payer system that allows the state government to buy health services for everyone

Why is this a solution? No one has EVER proved a single payor system works long run. Savings generated, if any, are only temporary. One year maximum

And the state government can’t buy anyone anything. They don’t have their own money to pay for it.

The measure establishes a system that, in theory, would be funded by payroll taxes on businesses of 8 percent and individual income taxes of 3 percent. Those taxes would replace the premiums that individuals and businesses now pay to insurance companies

See? Taxes replace premiums. Taxes are not government money, just ours sent through a different food chain.

Schwarzenegger has said he will release his proposal for making health care more accessible to Californians in January, if he is re-elected in the November general election. He supports streamlining private insurance coverage through the use of new technology and other approaches that make private insurance coverage more affordable

Streamlining coverage through the use of technology. Sounds like a Star Trek approach. Beam me up Scottie.

Advocates of SB 840 say their plan will save consumers and businesses about $8 billion a year because the government will be able to negotiate lower prices with health care providers

Lower fees to providers mean fewer providers willing to accept the lower fees. Add to that increased demand created by “free” health insurance and the result is more rationing of health care.

Lower fees to providers is a one year fix. After that you are back to the same issues you have now.

"The governor just doesn't get it,"

Neither do you.

Where is the Victim?

Advocates for affordable healthcare said yesterday that a key piece of the state's new health insurance law asks far too little of businesses, requiring them to provide employees only bare-bones coverage to avoid a $295 per-worker fee for companies offering no insurance plan

Personally, I fail to see why government should be allowed to force a business to provide ANY coverage. This is just another form of tax increase.

The rule's supporters said lawmakers who reached the deal in the spring shared a modest goal: ending an unfair system that allowed companies offering no insurance to get a free ride by relying on more generous employers to help foot the bill for uninsured medical expenses. The Democrat-led Legislature that adopted the nation's most ambitious healthcare restructuring didn't embrace the broader goal of requiring employers to meet minimum coverage levels, supporters said.

What is “unfair” about free enterprise? Employers who pay a generous wage, and provide health insurance & retirement benefits are able to attract a higher class of employee and will experience lower turnover. If a business owner CHOOSES to pay less than their competitors, and CHOOSES to bypass employee benefits, then who suffers?

The customers of the lower paying business usually get the lower price goods they want. The employees have a job they are willing to accept at a compensation level that is suitable to their needs & qualifications.

WHO is hurt in this situation?

Friday, August 11, 2006

(Potentially) Light Blogging Ahead...

The Prof family will be on vacation next week, and I have little hope of Mrs Prof allowing me access to any computers.

My able (and prolific) co-blogger Bob Vineyard is on his own here; please be nice ;-)

Cavalcade of Risk: Reminder

Next week's C of R will be at My Money Forest. Tim's looking for a few good posts, so please consider helping him out.
You can submit your posts (or even someone else's):
■ via email
or
■ at Ferdy's
And don't forget: hosting a Cavalcade is fun and easy, and can be a nice "traffic spike" (the good kind). Interested? Just let us know.

Scooped by a Bean-Counter!

Joe Kristan is all over the Corporate Owned Life Insurance (COLI) topic, with the latest news and helpful tips. A must-read.

Thursday, August 10, 2006

Health Wonk Review

Matthew Holt hosts this week's edition of the Health Wonk Review. Matt's put 16 posts into a useful index.
With Cuba's Fearless Leader in whatever straits he's in, Jared at the Lucidicus Project has a report on that island paradise's health system.

Doing the Laundry...

Sometimes, when I just can’t help it, I sell life insurance. My clientele generally runs to the middle class, although I do count as clients one state representative, a Public Utilities commissioner, and an engineer.
But, because I am in the “financial services” industry, I am apparently subject to new rules put in place by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN, not to be confused with CENTCOM).
HIPAA, Sarbanes-Oxley, and FinCen; insurance carriers are now required to set up “anti-money laundering” processes, and to file “Suspicious Activity Reports.” Thankfully, we peons (literally: insurance agents) are absolved from actually establishing and maintaining our own such programs.
Still, we are required to be familiar with our carriers’ plans, and to undergo special training to learn about them, and to be aware of the scope of “the problem.” Although I’m not really convinced that Abdul is going to walk in with a cool 10 G’s, looking for a “hot life policy,” I’m subject to this requirement, and recently spent part of an afternoon fulfilling it.
I find CBT (Computer Based Training) to be both a pain in the, um, PC and pretty cool. I miss the interactivity of classroom learning, but it’s also fun to go at my own pace, and make snarky comments while absorbing the material. The purpose of this online program was to raise my awareness of “anti-money laundering rules” [ed: shouldn’t that be anti “money-laundering?”], in order to be more adept at spotting such activities.
Actually, I had never thought about how the life insurance business could be used for this sort of thing. Since cash value policies (e.g. Whole or Universal life, annuities, etc) all have onerous cash surrender penalties in the early years, it seemed to me that they would be poor choices for quickly moving large sums of cash.
Turns out, though, that I just wasn’t devious enough in my thinking: one of the consumer-friendly features of such policies is the “free look” provision, which is “where the action is.” In this scenario, a prospective customer comes in, and plunks down $10,000 for a single premium annuity. I submit that, along with the completed application, to the insurer. The policy is issued, and the client says “um, y’know what, never mind, I really don’t want this after all.” I send the policy back to the carrier, and a few weeks later, a refund check drawn on the carrier’s account comes back to the “prospect.” He’s just laundered the loot.
Granted, I probably would have had some questions of my own in this case, but it illustrates how even innocuous vehicles like annuities can be used for illicit purposes. And the course gave numerous other examples, as well, which also surprised me. For my part, I’m now more aware of clues and tell-tale signs, and cognizant of the potential for abuse.
All in all, I’d have to say: 45 minutes well-spent.

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

$680,000 and Counting . . .

The last week of May. Kristin (a friend of the family, not her real name) was on her way home from school. It had been raining, the roads were wet but did not appear dangerous.

The phone rang. Your daughter has been in an accident. You need to come to the hospital.

The car was damaged beyond recognition. Kristin had to be removed by with the aid of the jaws of life. She was stabilized and transported to the hospital.

Mother arrived at the hospital and was told the news. Kristin had been severely injured. In addition to lacerations she had 2 fractured cervical vertebrae and would be admitted to surgery to allow for placement of a halo brace.

Until the swelling goes down, there is no way to know exactly how much paralysis, if any, is involved. Kristin had just turned 21. She was not what you would call a problem child, but she did lack direction and focus. She was even considering dropping out of school.

Over the next few weeks Kristin’s condition improved. Her cut’s and bruises healed and eventually she progressed to the point where she could sit up in bed. Eventually she would have to learn to walk again, feed & dress herself . . . daily routines most of us take for granted.

It has now been just over 2 months since Kristin’s accident. She still wears a brace but she is adjusting to a new normal.

The bills are still coming in, but not as frequently or as large as they were initially. As of now the total is $680,000 . . . most of which was paid by insurance.

Had this happened after Kristin dropped out of school the outcome might have been different, especially without health insurance.

She would still be 21. She would still be relearning a new routine for daily life. The difference would be the $680,000 debt hanging over her head.

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Kiwi Insurance

More people are taking out health insurance with the cut to elective surgery waiting lists in public hospitals one of the reasons.

Umbrella group, Health Funds Association's executive director, Claire Austin says there has been a 1% increase in membership of health insurance companies, or about 13,500 people joining up in the last quarter.

She says the private sector is now funding half of common elective surgeries, such as hip replacements and cataract operations.

Austin says those seeking information on health insurance through the association often blame the cuts to waiting lists.

Major New Zealand health insurance company, Southern Cross Healthcare, is reporting its biggest leap in membership in five years as a result of the waiting list cuts. The insurer says its membership has increased by 7,500 to a total of 808,000 in the last year.

Southern Cross group chief executive Ian McPherson says the waiting lists issue is a significant reason for the increase. He says the number of people without insurance paying cash for operations in private hospitals has also increased.


Free health care + private insurance. Who would have thought??

Battle Royal

Locally, the Blues just settled a dispute with Piedmont hospital and their docs over network pricing. What this meant was, for a little over a month you could continue to use the same docs & hospital as before, but your out of pocket was going to be more.

In some cases, a lot more.

Two years ago in Atlanta we had the same kind of showdown. Once again Blue was the carrier but Tenet hospitals were on the other side of the bargaining table. That dispute lasted about 2 months.

Now this.

Thousands of Denver-area patients may need to find a new hospital because of a contracting quarrel between a giant insurer and a hospital system.
HealthOne, parent company of seven metro-area hospitals and 10 surgery centers, is warring with United Healthcare over reimbursement rates.

On Tuesday, the company sent a letter to its 3,500 affiliated doctors, warning that its contract with United may end on Aug. 31. From then on, HealthOne facilities would be "out of network" for United Healthcare's nearly 1 million Colorado members.

"We are far apart on many issues," the letter said, "and we will not continue as participating providers unless we agree on acceptable terms."

The HealthOne contract affects all of United's business: its HMOs, PPOs and PacifiCare Secure Horizon's business.

Likewise HealthOne, a joint venture between nonprofit HealthOne Alliance and for-profit HCA Inc., gets 9 percent of its inpatient volume from United. Some 3,200 of its own employees have health insurance through United Healthcare.

The pair have been negotiating for months


Every time this happens, patients get squeezed. If it hasn't happened to you yet, just wait.

Never Argue with a Bipolar

Phone rings

Me: Hello.

Bipolar: I am looking for health insurance and I was given your name & number.

Me: Thanks for calling. I need to get some information such as date of birth, height & weight as well as any meds you take.

Bipolar: I take (2 psychotropic meds, 4 BP meds and one HRT).

Comment to self, this is going to be a short conversation . . .

Me: Do you have coverage now?

Bipolar: Yes, I have coverage through my employer but I can’t afford it.

Me: How much does it cost?

Bipolar: I don’t know, it comes out of my check.

Second comment to self; this is going to be even shorter than I thought.

Me: If you don’t know how much it costs, then how do you know it costs too much?

Bipolar: Because I can’t afford to go to the doctor. The copays are too high. I want something with better coverage but at a lower price.

Now I figure I might as well have some fun since I am already in to this.

Me: So how much can you afford to pay in monthly premium?

Bipolar: How can I know how much it costs? That is why I called you. Don’t you know?

OK, time to pull the plug on this one.

Me: You really need to keep your current plan.

Bipolar: But I can’t afford it.

Me: As I was saying, you need to keep your current plan. No carrier will take you as a bipolar.

Bipolar: I should have known better than to call you. Insurance companies are all alike.

She hangs up.

Two minutes later the phone rings.

Me: Hello.

Bipolar: I am looking for health insurance and I was given your name & number.

I guess being bipolar is not her only issue. Seems like a touch of short term memory lapse as well . . .

This is a true story. I can’t make this stuff up.

Small Business Storm Warning

According to SurePayroll, a lot of small employers may drop their group health plans in the next year or so:
According to a survey commissioned by the online payroll service provider, a little over half of the nation's small businesses currently offer some kind of group health benefit, and a little over half of those pay the lion's share of the premiums (okay, they really don't, but that's another post.
One quibble: they don't define a "small business;" could be 2 people, could be 100.
Something else that showed up: of those small employers who don't currently offer a plan, more than half indicate that they may offer one next year.

Monday, August 07, 2006

Cash Please

In the age of $3+ per gallon gasoline you can’t fill your tank without first paying for the gas. Now the same approach could be coming to an ER near you.

HCA Inc., which owns JFK and St. Lucie Medical, is enacting the policy at several of its hospitals nationwide. The punitive measure reflects the near-chronic clogging of emergency rooms, often with patients whose minor scrapes, coughs and aches could be treated - cheaper - at a doctor's office or clinic. The worst result of the pay-first policy would be a seriously ill patient being turned away because he did not appear sick enough and could not pay the $140 upfront fee. Some doctors are worried they might become targets for malpractice lawsuits. And apprehension about the policy could deter patients with genuine emergencies.

The ER crisis includes crowding, long waits and patients being turned away, especially during the winter tourist season, but it also reflects a shortage of nurses, hand surgeons, neurosurgeons and other specialists - a problem Palm Beach County hospital executives, doctors and health-care specialists have been working to solve for more than two years. Clinics such as Martin County's Volunteers in Medicine site help, as would federal attention to immigration, requiring employers to provide some level of health benefit for the workers they hire. But the crowding reflects a problem that pay-first policies will not solve: lack of insurance

Health Care for Everyone!

San Francisco is poised to offer health care coverage to 82,000 residents, but the plan only fiddles around the edges of a failing system. What we need is a federally funded, comprehensive program of vouchers that provides basic health coverage for everyone.

Federally funded.

No such thing.

The correct term is TAXPAYER funded.

Ideally, every person in America would have personal health care coverage from childhood, through school and a career, and into retirement. Coverage would no longer depend on employment or pre-existing conditions. Basic health care would be free, and additions to standard coverage would be available for a price

The operative word here is “ideally”.

It's going to be expensive to provide basic health care to everyone, but it makes sense, not just as a matter of social justice but because we can prevent more-expensive care later.

It IS true that many maladies are preventable but there is little to show that there is a SIGNIFICANT increase on the overall health of those who have ready access to routine care.

People who have insurance still are obese which can lead to heart disease, diabetes, increased risk of stroke and a host of medical problems.

Doctors, hospitals and pharmaceutical companies would have to give up their distorted system of payments in which economic incentives reward those who do the most testing, prescribe the most drugs and overtreat patients who are in fee-for-service plans now

Many times more testing is done as a defensive practice. Fail to order enough tests and the treatment may not be covered by insurance. Even worse, you may be subject to litigation for malpractice if your testing fails to rule out every conceivable illness.

Doc’s make nothing by prescribing two pills when one (or none) will work. However, with direct to consumer advertising if the doc fails to write a script, or fails to prescribe the medication the patient asked for, that patient may simply shop for a new doc that will give them what they want . . . whether they need it or not.

If doctors are ROUTINELY “over-treating” their patients, I have yet to see anything to support such an accusation. Perhaps the author of this article has access to information I have not seen.

Government should set a basic health care benefit required in every private health plan. It should also compel the health insurance industry to be accountable and reliable

More government intrusion.

Every time the government passes a new mandate the cost of health insurance goes up not down.

And government must finance the system

Here we go again.

The government doesn’t have their own money.

But let's be honest: There would probably need to be some increase in taxes.

Ahh, now we see the truth. Higher taxes.

How much higher?

No one knows.

Every health plan would be free to offer upgrades beyond the government-paid basic plan

OK, I jumped the gun a bit. Now he is back to referring to it as a government paid plan. Seems he forgot the part about increasing taxes.

Must be a short term memory lapse. Wonder if that is covered as a “basic” benefit or one of those additional benefits paid for by the folks who have the funds to “buy up” to the better plan.

Oops! This is sounding like a class system where the “rich” have access to better health care.

Maybe the author can remedy that as well.

Where There’s a Will...

When working with life insurance clients, I usually (although not always, to my shame) ask if they have a valid, current will. Such an instrument is important for a number of reasons, not the least of which is to ensure that one’s final wishes are known, and (hopefully) carried out.
Wills generally cover the disposition of property, caring for any children, and charitable bequests. But what about one’s legacy?
Hunh?
We’ve all heard about “living wills,” but what about “ethical wills?” One of my absolute favorite books is “Ender’s Game,” by Orson Scott Card. In it, he introduces a person called a “Speaker for the Dead.” It is this person’s job to forthrightly report on the life of the dearly beloved, warts and all.
Absent such a person (it is science fiction, after all), an ethical will is a means for one to sit down with one’s estate planner and talk about life experiences, what one’s learned (and what one wishes had been learned), family history, personal stories (funny and sad), and the like. And, of course, how one wishes assets to be “divvied up.”
In a recent Harris Interactive poll of 1,200 Americans aged 40 to 59, 77% of those surveyed said that knowing exactly their parent’s values was very important, while only 10% said it was important that they inherited financial assets from their parents. ” (ibid)
Hopefully, we’ve learned what our parents lived, and have, in turn, helped our own children adopt an appropriate value system. But I found this idea to be quite interesting: to not just assume that they know, but to ensure it.
Food for thought.

Monday Money...

With almost 40 posts, this week's Carnival of Personal Finance is a blockbuster. Compiled by host J.D. at Get Rich Slowly, each post has its own headline and recap.
My better half hates it when I don't leave 20% as a tip, even if the service doesn't warrant it. Plus, I always tip on the balance before tax, which also drives her nuts. Which is why I appreciated this post from David at The Good Human blog.
And a big Tip o'the Hat to David Hunter, proprietior of The Business of America, for filling in (at the last minute!) as host of this week's Carnival of the Capitalists. David aggregated over 40 posts, and even had time to include a brief description with each one. Kudos!
And if you're in the mood for something exotic to wash down your meal, check out this suggestion from AvantNews. Yummy!

Sunday, August 06, 2006

Insurance Dispatch

The new column is up, and available at The Medical Blog Network.

This week, we look at how quickly and accurately health insurance carriers pay claims. There's even an interactive online tool to help out.

Saturday, August 05, 2006

WeekEnd LinkFest

If you haven't checked out some of the other great sites on our blogroll, here's a sampler of what you're missing:

Joe Kristan at Roth & Co makes sense of the whole Estate Tax controversy (now that's an accomplishment!).

Over at the Health Business Blog, Eric Zimmerman has a great piece on how health care "consumerism" and internet-based information come together.

Jon Coppelman, co-host of Workers Comp Insider (which, BTW, plays host to the current Cavalcade of Risk), shows us that Mom was right when she told us to "stop that before someone gets hurt!"

And Bob Coffield at the Health Care Law Blog fills us in on the new Health Information Technology Promotion Act (now there's a mouthful).

High Risk Coverage

Premiums for the state's health insurance plan for high-risk people will rise in October - an increase that could force even more Nebraskans out of the program.

Premiums are expected to jump an average 23 percent - even more for older people buying lower-deductible coverage.


The plan is for people who do not have access to health insurance through employers and can't get coverage from private insurers, or would have higher premiums through private insurance

High risk pools, usually considered the answer to uninsurable conditions, are becoming more costly to run. Even with taxpayer subsidies the premiums paid by the insured is becoming cost prohibitive.

In 2004, more than 6,000 Nebraskans bought insurance through the state's Comprehensive Health Insurance Pool. By June, the number had dropped 10 percent, to 5,400

As the number of participants drop, the cost of providing cover for the rest of the pool increases as fewer dollars are available to pay claims. This results in even higher premium increases for those who remain in the pool.

State Insurance Director Tim Wagner said rising claims could exceed revenue in a couple years. The program is paid for by people's premiums and a subsidy from the state tax on insurance premiums.

With the increase, Nebraska will have some of the highest premiums for any state high-risk program in the nation, said Holly Whelan with the American Diabetes Association.


At least one state (Florida) closed their risk pool a few years ago to new entrants. Other states may follow and Nebraska may very well be the next.

Don't Buy Health Insurance

From the Indianapolis Star . .

The Aug. 1 editorial, "Do-it-yourself fixes for high health costs," neglected one significant step consumers can take to hold down costs: If you are relatively young and healthy, don't buy health insurance. Learn to distinguish between the cost of health insurance and the cost of treatment, and be aware that for the large majority insurance premiums are approximately five to 10 times the actual cost of medical care in any given year. For a family of four, the break-even point is about $4,000 to $5,000.

Great advice!

Only buy health insurance in the years where your expenses will exceed $5,000.

Dr. Goofy Look's at Reality

The University of Miami's 1-year-old primary-care practice in Key Biscayne, run by internist Dr. Pamela Merino, will close Sept. 1, leaving some village residents and employees looking for a new doctor.

Even though the university expected Merino's office to lose $50,000 to $80,000 a year, in the past 12 months it was almost $250,000 in the red, said Jerry Broderick, assistant chairman of the university's department of medicine.

''The loss was far greater than what we'd planned for,'' Broderick said. ``Professional fees and patient revenues were never at the level we had hoped to achieve.''

The university will keep its concierge practice, which charges $1,500 a person for more personalized services and preventive care not covered by typical insurance plans.

Paging Dr. Goofy

The sage green carpet and d├ęcor in the lobby are welcoming and restful to the eyes. The woman behind the counter, concierge Arlene Dullaghand, greets visitors with a smile. After acknowledging their arrival, she tells a mother and her children someone will be with them soon to “shepherd them” to the area of service. The children head to the PlayStations in the game room while the woman helps herself to the coffee bar.

“I love everything here,” said Laurie Wheeler, who came with sons Justin, 10, and David, 12. The boys couldn’t wait to play their favorite video game. Wheeler, if she wants, can check her e-mail in the patient library/computer room.

“This is really fancy. They deserve fancy,” Ronda Woods said of the Parkview Medical Group clinic she manages, and of the people who come through its doors at 10515 Illinois Road, just west of Scott Road. Her staff benefit from the lessons she’s learned from people running such places as Disney World, Ritz-Carlton hotels and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Friday, August 04, 2006

OT: Technical Question

Okay, so I'm not the uber-geek I thought I was. We've had a number of requests recently from folks who'd like to be automatically notified when we post new items. I'm pretty sure that they're talking about RSS feeds, and I did add the RSS "chiclet" to the side-bar.
Is that all I have to do, or am I missing something?
Any and all helpful suggestions are welcome.
Have a great weekend!

Thursday, August 03, 2006

Sneakin’ a Peek...

With all the talk about “transparency,” it’s easy to forget that it’s still about our health care, including why it costs so much.
Here’s a clue:

According to MedSolutions, which deals with quality management of medical imaging services, radiology seems to be the next big cost battleground between health plans and physicians. HealthLeaders-InterStudy, which conducted the study, found that radiology costs have risen to nearly 10 percent of each healthcare dollar, and are anticipated to grow at a rate of 18 to 20 percent per year.
And here you thought it was all Big Pharma and insurance carriers.

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Cavalcade of Risk (#5)

The good folks at Workers Comp Insider host the biggest Cavalcade yet: with 20 posts, Julie has done a tremendous job. Plus, each entry has a little blurb explaining what it's about - I like that.
Wenchypoo (dont'cha LOVE that handle?) at Frugal Wisdom has a chilling, cautionary tale about how secure (or insecure) your IT info really is. Eye-opening.

And Another Thing...

If you’re sick of the whole discount/non-discount brouhaha, please feel free to skip this one: I have a mini-rant coming on.
In a nutshell, folks with network-driven plans, who see par providers for non-covered expenses, don’t get the insurance companies’ discounts for those services. Nowhere in the sales literature or training, nor in the policies themselves, is this made clear.
So, an agent who is not aware of this situation has no obligation to inform his client – or potential clients – of this salient fact.
But what about those of us who do?
I’ve already mentioned how I felt compelled to explain this to a potential client. Today, I had an even more worrisome experience:
One of my clients is a locksmith, who has a (very) small business. About 5 years or so ago, I sold him (or he bought from me, you pick) an MSA (subsequently converted to an HSA). He came by today, because we needed some locks re-keyed. I hadn’t spoken with him in a while, so we spent some time catching up on “mom and them,” and (naturally) the conversation turned to his insurance. He positively gushed about how happy he’s been with the HSA; in fact, he has almost $10,000 socked away in the loss fund, money that (in his words) would have been in the insurance company’s pockets, not his.
So why am I ticked?
Because I had to decide whether or not to ask him about his experiences (if any) with non-covered expenses. I literally argued with myself for several minutes about this. In the end, he excused himself to go about his work, so I was (at least for the nonce) relieved from engaging him in this subject. But I know that I will – I must – bring it up with him at some point, most likely sooner than later.
Ah, ignorance is bliss. (Or would be, I suppose)

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

HMO's From the Other Side

[BUMPED]

A lot has been said about HMO's over the years . . . much of it negative. Comic's have made jokes about HMO's. The general press has not looked on them favorably for their "hands on" manipulation of health care treatment.

My own experience, at least with Kaiser Permanente, has been positive. Now from someone who has posted comments on this site in the past comes this observation.

I may not agree with Marc's view on risk management as it applies to health insurance, but I do applaud his bravery in dealing with personal health challenges.

Here is a small portion of his story.

At this point I have to add a plug for all the doctors, nurses and staff at Kaiser Permanente. They have been exceptional. I experienced the same treatment, when I was diagnosed with mantle cell lymphoma 4 years ago, but now I realize it wasn't just my bubbly personality which resulted in that great care.

Within the past two weeks, since my wife's MRI revealed an anomaly in her T2 vertebrae, she has had lots of blood work, a CT scan, bone scan, appointment with an oncologist and a biopsy of her T2 vertebrae. Today she has a bone marrow biopsy scheduled, to check for any spread of the disease, and tomorrow she has an appointment with the radiation oncologist.

I can't imagine that anyone could possibly receive better service from any other health care provider. Thank you Kaiser Permanente!

Grand Rounds...

Dr Lisa Marcucci hosts this week's edition of Grand Rounds. I really appreciate the way she's organized it, so that several similarly-themed are grouped together in paragraphs. Very cool.
One of my favorite med-bloggers, Dr John Ford, reminisces about a theory espoused by one of his medical school professors. Let's just say that life works in cycles.