Wednesday, January 09, 2019

The Overarching Deceit of Medicare4All

Ah, those right whingers at Kaiser strike again:
Wait, what?

Michael also points us to this more graphic illustration of the point:


Math is hard.

Tuesday, January 08, 2019

Once again: Coverage ≠ Care

The Much Vaunted National Health Service© presents the latest case in point:


[Hat Tip: Kishore J]

Monday, January 07, 2019

Cool New Blog

Longtime readers may recognize Dennis Wall, who provided us an interesting guest post about lender-forced insurance plans:

"LFPI [Lender force-placed insurance] is insurance which protects the lender’s interest in the borrower’s collateral. It is “collateral protection insurance” in the sense that it is insurance which protects only the collateral."

Dennis went on to chronicle for us some of the many problems and ethical issues that arose from this.

Well, Dennis has a new blog now
(which we've added to the sidebar), called (appropriately enough) Claims and Issues. It's less focused on insurance claims and issues, and more about just claims issues in general. Do check it out.

Weird Caller Tricks

So I get a phone call this past Friday from "Pam," who's looking for help with "personal health insurance." Turns out her husband's "idiot boss" had neglected to pay the group health insurance premiums, and as a result that plan had lapsed. At which point her "idiot husband" went on the Exchange (during Open Enrollment) and signed them up for a plan with Molina, to the tune of $2,100 per month (you know, 'affordable'). Pam was unhappy with both of these events (no kidding), and wanted to make some changes.

In the meantime, she had signed up for a UHC short term plan that will expire on the 20th.,

It should also be noted that Pam has a pre-existing shoulder injury for which she receives periodic treatment, and her "idiot husband" was recently diagnosed with a (thus far benign) thyroid nodule.

Hunh.

I explained that there really weren't a lot of insurance options here: since we're outside Open Enrollment, and I don't see any Special Open Enrollment triggers in her situation, there's not much we can do with ACA-compliant plans. Nor would another Short Term plan be advisable, since both her shoulder and now her "idiot husband's" thyroid condition would be pre-existing and thus excluded.

I then turned to some non-insurance (but ACA-compliant) options, and asked if she was familiar with Health Care Sharing arrangements; she was not. So I explained to her that, although I don't write these myself, I do know that there are a lot of folks who think they're pretty good (and also a lot who think they're a rip-off, of course). I also asked if she knew about Direct Primary Care (DPC) and, unsurprisingly, she did not. And so I explained how DPC worked, and how to use the DPC Frontier site to see if there's a nearby practice.

I also explained that many folks combine these two plans, and why that is often effective.

Keep in mind that I've now spent about 45 minutes with her answering questions and offering advice, and that since I wouldn't be selling her anything myself, this was completely uncompensated. On the other hand, The Sticker pretty much dictates this course of action.

At the end of the conversation, I asked if she had any other questions, and she said "no, I'm going to call the Exchange number and get my plan changed." And then she hung up.

Gee, Pam, you're quite welcome.

And rotsa ruck with that.

Sunday, January 06, 2019

In Memoriam: Joe Beyerle

Some 35 years ago, I had the pleasure of meeting a man who would become my boss, friend and mentor. Joe was the very definition of "larger than life." He passed away, peacefully, his family at his side, last night.

About 25 years ago, the local TV news did a report on laughter in the workplace, and the segment opened with a shot of our office from across the street.

You could hear Joe's laugh.

Joe's business model was pretty straightforward: do the right thing for our clients, always.

A devout and passionate Catholic, Joe organized a city-wide rosary prayer-a-thon that gained national attention.

Everyone knew Joe: I used to joke that if aliens ever landed here, the first thing they'd say would be "hey, where's Joe, I need insurance for my UFO."

He and the love of his life, Joan, were married for over 60 blissful years, and they have the kids, grandkids, and great grandkids to prove it.

He'd been in failing health for a while, and over the weekend preceding New Year's he was hospitalized. I was fortunate to visit them on Thursday morning, and had them all to myself for about an hour. He was still, well, Joe, and I got to experience his trademark smile more than once.

He quizzed me about my girls, and even offered a (tremendous) suggestion for my youngest.

We're members of a synagogue in northern Cincinnati, about 35 minutes away. At services yesterday morning, I mentioned his name for the healing prayer list. After services, a friend came up to me and said, "I recognized Joe's name." Because of course he did. Why was I even surprised?

I will miss you, Joe, and your laugh, and your compassion, and your love of the Reds.

But mostly, I will miss your warmth, and love, and compassion.

Baruch Dayan HaEmet. Rest in Peace, dear friend.

Friday, January 04, 2019

Outstanding Vendor Tricks: ID Theft Protection Done Right

Some time back, we had the opportunity to both buy and sell LifeLock ID Theft protection (we earned a modest commission on those sales). Eagle-eyed readers may have noticed that the LifeLock sidebar link has been gone for quite a while.

This was primarily as a result of this news last summer:

"Identity theft protection firm LifeLock — a company that’s built a name for itself based on the promise of helping consumers protect their identities online — may have actually exposed customers to additional attacks from ID thieves and phishers."

In the event, we discontinued our association at that time, and removed the link from the sidebar.

But we still had a need for the protection, and a good friend (and colleague) recommended Zander Insurance Group as a helpful and more economical alternative. In fact, their package includes all the features that we had appreciated from LifeLock, at a fraction of the price.

Of course, "cheaper" often means "lower quality" but that hasn't been the case at all: Recently, our primary credit card (from which our Zander ID plan premiums were charged) was hacked and we had to get replacement cards (and numbers). This in turn generated an email from Zander when our premium "bounced." So I called up the customer service number, and was almost immediately connected to a delightful young lady named Elizabeth. Not only did she offer great service with a smile, she also recognized that I had inadvertently set up a duplicate account and was being double charged. She immediately cancelled that second, unnecessary account, and arranged for a full refund of the fees.

It just doesn't get much better than that.

Thanks, Elizabeth!

This Time, It’s Medicare for All

One of the reasons Bernie Sanders’ sun has risen - and Hillary Clinton’s has set – is their differences over government-paid medical insurance.  (Which, of course, most people still call “healthcare”).

Bernie favors Medicare for All.  This is becoming more popular among the self-described progressives in the Democrat Party, and among the American far left. That’s because its leading advocates – e.g., Bernie – promise it will give everyone better insurance coverage, cost less, and be simple. What’s not to like?

Contrast Hillary who favors fixing Obamacare, or at least has always said she favors fixing Obamacare.  Her major objection to Bernie’s idea is that Medicare for All would cost too much, and require even higher taxes to pay for it. But that’s become a less popular policy position partly because of the growing recognition that Obamacare already costs too much, and is probably not fixable even if Hillary says it is.  So for the first time in more than 25 years, Hillary has lost the high ground on medical insurance.

There’s a backstory here.  At least two states have already tried to design single-payer plans for their residents. Both gave up because of high cost. In 2007, Connecticut shut down its state single-payer project because it would have cost more than the entire state budget.  And in 2014, Bernie’s own State of Vermont shut down its project for about the same reason.  But when have facts mattered to progressive/leftist Democrats who clothe themselves in robes of social justice? I expect that in the next national presidential campaign, Medicare for All will be a prominent Democratic Party talking point.  

So it’s important to recall that back in 2010, the Democratic Party had to deceive America to sell us Obamacare. Thanks to Professor Jonathan Gruber, we learned that all along the progressive/leftist Democrats considered Americans “stupid” and easily fooled.  

My opinion? None of the promises about Medicare for All – more insurance coverage, for less cost, and simple administration - survive thoughtful analysis from experts other than the partisan progressive/leftist Democrats themselves. 

Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.

Thursday, January 03, 2019

Direct Primary Cult? A Reality Check [UPDATED]

[Please scroll down for Update]

In which its adherents fall into the same trap as those who conflate health insurance and health care.

Look, I have long been a fan of the Direct Primary Care (DPC) model: in fact, we were among the first to interview one of its pioneers, way back in Aught 12.

There is much positive to be said about DPC: it satisfies the ObamaTax mandate (which may or may not matter for this year), and offers the opportunity for better clinical outcomes based on more patient-focused care.

Unfortunately, it seems that its advocates think a lot more highly of the model than is actually justified. For one thing, it is literally a blip on the health care radar: there are about a quarter of a million primary care doc's in the US, and less than 1,000 of them are DPC (that's about 4/10's of 1%). As I recently pointed out to one of the more outspoken DPC folks, it's not that DPC is a bad thing, it's just not a thing. And the idea that it can be easily or quickly (or realistically) scaled up to meet a meaningful number of patients' needs is, frankly, laughable.

And of course, we've discussed numerous times (here for example) how DPC folks continue to make the fallacious argument that it makes economic sense for patients*. Until true Catastrophic medical plans are allowed once again (they're currently illegal under ObamaCare), then one of two things will continue to be true:

1) That folks will be double-paying for primary care (since it's already covered under ObamaPlans) or

2) They'll drop their major med plans in favor of DPC only, leaving themselves exposed to potentially massive catastrophic claims.

Sigh.

So what's your point here, Henry? Or are you just blowing off steam?

Good question - mostly the latter.

Happy New Year!

UPDATE: From our friend Mike Bertaut (an economist with Louisiana Blue Cross):

"Insurance carriers depend on primary care docs with a free flow of patient health data via EHR's to keep patients healthy. A huge slice of care coordination (especially post-discharge) and much of predictive modeling, both of which are now big contributors to keeping claims costs down require in-network, EHR sharing PCP's. To me this makes the idea of carving out primary care not only counter-intuitive, but bad for the patient and his healthcare costs overall."

I can see that, although I do see a role for DPC in the area of access and more patient-centered care.


*To be fair: Many (most?) DPC practices do offer discounted rx options, which has the net effect of lowering the subscription cost.

Wednesday, January 02, 2019

This is scary: CVS vs Your health


But just what makes this development so troubling?

Well:

"Thanks to NICE guidelines, millions of British citizens are on waiting lists at any given time for procedures, hundreds of thousands are waiting for basic diagnostic tests, and thousands of operations are regularly cancelled."

Opening soon here.

A CanuckCare© Two-fer

Shot:

"Had a patient today who had a skin cancer on her nose. 6 month wait for Mohs surgery removal in Toronto and no pathway for Facial Plastic Surgery nasal reconstruction following. She went to the US and was treated the next day."

Regular readers know that situations like this are a common occurrence under Canada's state-run health "care" system. Unfortunately, those who advocate such a system here seem to be, well, oblivious (or just don't care).

Chaser (courtesy of our friends at OOC):

Monday, December 31, 2018

Happy New Year!




May 2019 bring all of our readers, family and friends joy and hope, health and happiness.

Baruch HaShem.

Friday, December 28, 2018

#JustThePunchline: The ObamaTax

Bwahahaha!!

In case you were wondering: Medicare help

Co-blogger Bob is our Medicare guru; here he shares some timely, helpful tips about choosing the right advisor:

Thursday, December 27, 2018

The ACA and Hours Worked: A Taxing Situation

Shot:

"[I]f you employ more than 49 people, you've either got to offer (and help pay for) a group plan or pay a penalty tax ... Here's the problem: if you currently employ 49 people, you're not going to be hiring that 50th guy, because that would cancel your exemption."

And of course that little gem gave us the FTE (Full Time Equivalent) calculation. And of further course, people (including, believe it or not, employers) look for ways to avoid pain. Sometimes, though, that doesn't quite work out...

Chaser:

Wednesday, December 26, 2018

ACA Mortality Update

Regular readers already ready know about the ObamaCare body count:

"Mortality Rates Suggests Obamacare Could Be Killing People ... equivalent to an excess 11,000 annual U.S. adult deaths relative to the pre-Obamacare steady state trends"

But that was then (a year-and-a-half ago), and this is now, so what's changed?

Not much, apparently:



"This has raised concern that some hospitals may be avoiding readmissions, even for patients who would benefit most from inpatient care."

Ooops.

[Hat Tip: FoIB Dr Kris Held]

Friday, December 21, 2018

From the P&C Files: Maybe not so simple, after all

So:


As FoIB tsrblke points out, we insure all kinds of other "homes on wheels," why would this be a big deal.

And to be fair, my inclination was to agree with him. But then I started digging, and the facts have caused me to change my mind.

First, there's this little nugget in the actual story:

"She had been gradually building the home piece by piece."

So here we have at least three very different, and distinct, risks going on: first, builder's risk, which is a special policy for when a home is under construction. Second, despite the fact that it will eventually become a "home," it will be a portable one. So does that make it more like the camper being towed down the highway by an F150, or the ones sitting perfectly still at Grannie's Mobile Home Park and Putt Putt course?

The owner did acknowledge that "it was difficult to get her home insured because most insurance companies struggle to classify what it should fall under."

My initial reaction was that maybe she (or the article's author) just didn't try very hard, but then I turned to our friend, resident P&C guru Bill M, who pointed out that sure, there are markets for this out there, but it's not as simple as insuring a Buick. He also noted something we've discussed before: just because coverage could be available doesn't mean that she's going to easily find it.

Why's that, Henry?

Well, the fact is that this kind of case will take more than just a cursory phone call by the agent. He (or she) is going to have to put in considerable time just identifying all those moving parts, and then trying to find the appropriate market (carrier) to handle it. And all of this for a relatively modest commission. So it's likely that even if the (tiny) home's owner did call around, she probably ran into "well, who do you have your current home and car with?" And justifiably so: one-off's like this aren't a very profitable way for most agents to make a living.

It takes much more than a simple cookie cutter approach.

Thursday, December 20, 2018

Oh, that naughty MVNHS© strikes again

Looks like someone's getting a lump of coal:

Wednesday, December 19, 2018

Interesting: HIT vs Medicare

The other day, we received an email about HealthMarkets' recently published Medicare Advantage Costs Index. The Index seeks to "determine the average annual 2019 Medicare costs in each state." It was compiled from a number of pretty reliable sources (including government data), and its purpose is to compare different states' costs year-over-year.

For example:

"Nevada has the lowest costs, while Kansas has the largest decrease in costs from last year."

Score one for flyover country!

Anyway, this is outside my particular wheelhouse, so I asked co-blogger Mike for his take. He wondered "what changes in HIT apply for 2019, and what effect those changes have in their study."

Which seems a most cromulent point, no? After all, things change.

So I replied to Caroline Liller (who had sent us the original email) and asked her about this.

She graciously replied:

"Thanks for your interest! I can get more information from the HealthMarkets team regarding health information technology changes."

And so she did.

HealthMarkets CMO Michael Stahl replied:

“The one year suspension of the HIT for 2019 is one of the direct causes of the results we’re seeing in our Medicare Advantage Costs Index. The suspension of the HIT is driving costs down overall, but especially premiums.

Without carriers having to pay the tax, they are instantly more profitable. With this new general competitive environment, carriers can deploy lower rates to gain market share, offer better benefits, lower deductibles and lower out of pocket expenses. Since there are many factors involved--not just the one year suspension of the tax--it’s too early to tell how rates will be affected in 2020
.”

Imagine that: lower taxes = more profitability.

One wonders if that concept might be applied to other areas of the economy....

Mike adds:

"Notice your correspondent says (1) the HIT reduction instantly makes plans "more profitable" and at the same time (2) enables plans to lower rates. Not likely for both to happen at same time. Also, Aetna was able to continue its 2018 Medicare Advantage rates into 2019 - but did not lower them.

Interesting eh?
"

Indeed.


Thanks Caroline and Michael!

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

A Quick Note on the Texas Ruling

Readers may be wondering why we've not been "all over" the recent court ruling "outlawing" the ACA.

It's pretty simple: for now, it changes nothing: Open Enrollment is almost* over (and see below), and it will take some time before the case makes its inevitable way to the Roberts "It's a Tax" Court.

Meantime, there are a lot of posts on it from all ends of the political spectrum on the 'net; I recommend reading at least a few from each side.

Oh! About that "almost:"

Criminal Agent Tricks

We've read about some shady insurance folks before; here, for example:

"Southland agents arrested for fraud and ID theft in commissions scam ...  multiple felony counts of identity theft and grand theft after allegedly submitting fraudulent insurance applications with information from stolen identities"

Now, FoIB Jeff M alerts us to the shenanigans undertaken by his previous agent:

"A Wilmington insurance agent is behind bars after allegedly embezzling thousands of dollars from clients."

The 69-year-old agent, Roy Payton Warren Jr, stands accused of embezzling about $15,000.

Wait, Moriarty Jr here glommed $15k??? Talk about the soft bigotry of low expectations.

To be fair, I searched to net for almost a half hour trying to find details of just how this criminal mastermind pulled off such a heist, alas to know avail.

Oh well.

Monday, December 17, 2018

Sad Travel Medical Tricks

So a British tourist, on her dream vacation abroad, dives into what turned out to be a much shallower pool than she thought, and ended up paralyzed, likely for life:

"Family and friends of Sophie Wilson, 24, are desperately trying to raise £60,000 ($75,528) to pay for a specialist medical flight home after her insurer refused to cover costs"

Fortunately, she'd bought travel medical insurance to cover just such an eventuality.

Except:

"... her travel insurance company Insure and Go declined to cover her medical bills as the accident occurred as a result of “reckless behavior.”

Say what?

I don't presume to know everything about these plans, but something just didn't smell right about that, so I reached out to FoIB Peter S at Global Underwriters (our guru of all things travel medical) for his take:

"Hank – I have never heard of that company and we don’t have exclusions for “reckless behavior” other than intoxication."

Which leads me to believe that maybe we're only getting one side of the story. Oh:

"The Sun Online has contacted Insure and Go for a comment."

Be interesting to know if maybe the young lady had had one (or 5) too many Mai Tai's.

Deadly Life Insurance Tricks

We've blogged before on some of the dumb - and evil - things people have done in the pursuit of the almighty life insurance buck:

"California dad charged with insurance fraud after he drove off cliff, killing autistic sons"

But here's one that hits close to home:

"Husband's death was blamed on alligators, but prosecutors say his wife ordered him killed for $1.75 million insurance money."

And why is this IB material?

Wait for it....

"The man who shot him was his best friend and insurance agent Brian Winchester, who confessed last year to the killing." [emphasis added]

As the saying goes: this isn't how it works.

It's true: I've led quite the sheltered life, but I don't think I'm alone in being appalled and, frankly, surprised at the depth of the depravity here. And to see a fellow agent turn to murdering his own client (let alone best friend)?

Words fail.

Friday, December 14, 2018

How's Healthcare.gov Doing?

Through six weeks OE6 is at 4,132,432 plan selections. This includes the period from November 1st through December 8th.

So how does it compare to years past?

2015  4,171,714
2016  4,015,709
2017  4,678,432

Not bad, considering the better economy has created more opportunity for people to gain employer sponsored insurance, Virginia expanded Medicaid, Trump rolled back the Obama rule to allow short term plans to last up to a year, and he saved taxpayers by slashing "marketing and outreach" funding to special interest groups.

No comment

R'unh ro!

[click to enbiggen]

#CMSNotWoke

Thursday, December 13, 2018

Medicare4All in a nutshell

Hello, and Welcome to McDoctor's!

You might have seem this in the news recently:

"New technology revolutionizing area McDonald’s with self-order kiosks"


Well, turns out MickyD's isn't the only place in town implementing this new technology. Recently, FoIB Holly R was at her new (to her) doctor's office, where she was checked in via a similar kiosk:




[click to embiggen]

(And note the hand sanitizer next to it. Heh)

"There's a bank of them with one human helper."

Imagine the airport, or the self-checkout line at the grocery store.

It makes a lot of sense in the medical setting, as well: easier HIPAA compliance, and the machines don't get a paycheck or insurance, or vacay or sick days. And this doc's figured out how to have a bunch of them: imagine how much that would cost as human office staff.

Welcome to the future.

Merry Health Wonk Review!

Our good friend Peggy Salvatore hosts this month's joyous compendium of wonky posts, do stop by to unwrap one for yourself. From Massachusetts to Colorado to Russia, there's something to celebrate.

Thanks, Peggy!

Wednesday, December 12, 2018

Interesting CMS Trick

So as Open Enrollment v6.0 winds down (with Saturday being the deadline for most of us), those of us certified to sell on the Federal Marketplace (aka "Exchange" or "HIX") received this email from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) this morning:

"As with previous years, some consumers who call the Marketplace Call Center during high-volume periods may be asked to leave their contact information to complete their enrollment after the December 15 deadline. This process will reduce hold times and allow those consumers to come back and complete their enrollment for January 1 coverage." [emphasis in original]

Hunh.

So how does that work?

Well:

"As we get closer to the deadline, the Marketplace Call Center may start prompting some callers to leave their contact information. This is an automated process enabled when volume is high. When someone calls, they will either be asked to leave their information or they will wait to speak to a representative. If a consumer is able to speak with a representative, they will be offered assistance with enrollment. There is no option for a caller to ask a representative to leave their information for a later enrollment."

Well that makes sense, sorta:

If the deadline is December 15, and we've known about the dates and the cutoff for many months, why are we coddling late-comers who've had plenty of time to make this happen before the last minute? I think we all know the answer to that:

"Has anyone noticed there's only abt 10m enrolled in exchanges & the (2013) baseline estimate is about triple that?"

Proving that the rocket surgeons in DC will do pretty much anything to goose those numbers.


Outstanding Customer Service Trick

We recently purchased a new refrigerator to replace our previous 27 year old one (don't judge). Obviously, this entailed removing the old fridge, revealing ancient secrets which would have delighted Dr Jones.

Among them were several long-lost gift cards to various places, including one from Carrabba's Italian Grill. Since there was no indication of how much was left on it, I got online and clicked over to their company website, where there was a handy feature where one could check gift card balances. Alas, the widget required not only the card number (which I obviously had), but a 4 digit "pin number," as well (which this card lacked).

Not to be discouraged, I used the handy online contact form to explain my plight and ask for help.

I got an email reply almost immediately, asking for the card number, which I provided. What came next was purely delightful:
"Henry,

Can you please provide your mailing address so we can send a replacement card out in the mail? Since this card was produced back in 2007 it was not printed with a pin, which is now required at the time of redemption.

Thank you,
Gift card team"
Waitaminute! That little guy had been trapped under (or behind) our refrigerator for 11 years? Yikes! And these folks are offering to replace it?

WOW!

It just doesn't get any better than that.

Thanks, Carrabba's, and kudos!

Tuesday, December 11, 2018

From Zero, A Hero

So the other day, I ran into a (newish) outfit called The Zero Card, which appeared to promise that now ubiquitous "free" health care. And since this didn't appear to be a state-sanctioned (or run) program, I was intrigued, and so I reached out to FoIB Dutch Rojas for introductions.

Dutch hooked me up with TZC's Chuck Foster, who graciously spent almost an hour with me explaining how the plan works, its limitations and benefits:

The Zero Card is based out of Tulsa, Oklahoma, and its plans are currently available in almost a dozen markets (with expansion plans in the works). It's available to self-funded groups exclusively (why that must be will become evident shortly), and operates as a sort of "sub-network" to a company's primary insurance-provided primary network.

From the employee's perspective, it couldn't be simpler (or better):

By choosing a provider associated with The Zero Card, all deductibles, co-pays and co-insurance is waived, the procedure or service becomes free to that patient. This in contrast to using the primary network which would entail potentially large out-of-pocket expenses. Best of all, the employee (or covered dependent) incurs no charge or fee. And because of how it's designed, there are no pre-authorization or second opinion hassles. Sweet!

But of course, the actual service does come at a price, and entails a bit more framework. From the employer's end, there's a percentage of claims ("spend") cost, but the plan is designed to nullify that: everything is in a bundled transparent price agreement, no "percent of medicare," etc.

Here's how it works:

The employer enters into an agreement with The Zero Card folks to offer the benefit, at no upfront cost. What TZC does then is adds 15% to the cost of the service or procedure; the idea is that they've saved the employer more than enough to compensate for this added expense.

How do they do that? Well, they go out to local providers (doctors, hospitals, facilities) and negotiate service "bundles." This results in more business for those providers, and helps to drive down the service costs. Chuck explained it like this:

In a typical plan, a service that costs $10,000 means that the employer is on the hook for $8,000, the employee for $2,000 [ed: excludes deductibles and co-pays].

The Zero Card folks have negotiated rates to a point that, even though the employer is on the hook for 100% (plus the 15% The Zero Card fee) that they still save money and, of course, have very happy employees. In order for this to actually happen, they strive for at least 35% savings off the traditional insurers' networks.

Another thing that Chuck stressed to me is their data analysis prowess: they are able to pinpoint how and what claims are paid in a way that really helps employers understand what's happening with their employees' and their plans. One can see where that could be a major benefit for both the employer and the employees.

Of course, this model really only works with self-insured group plans (because there’s no way to incorporate it into traditional fully-funded insurance plans), so it's limited, but as more and more carriers roll out self-funded plans for smaller and smaller groups, that's bound to mean market growth for TZC, too.

One thing we didn't discuss, but which occurred to me afterwards was what, if any, role they might play in the Association Health Plan space. Maybe next time.

[IB Thanks to Dutch and Chuck!!]

Monday, December 10, 2018

The Flipside of HSA's

As regular readers know, we've long been advocates of Heath Saving Accounts (HSAs). Unfortunately,the individual medical market no longer allows the kind of true catastrophic plans that make the accounts financially viable, but hope springs eternal.

For those lucky enough to have group and/or older individual HSA plans, though, the tax benefits remain a major draw. But what happens when one hits retirement age and offboards to Medicare?

Well, at that point, you can no longer contribute to the account itself, but can continue using it for medical expenses. But you can also use it as a (supplemental?) retirement vehicle, and apparently that's quite the popular option. As FoIB Allison Bell reports:

"Steve Neeleman, HealthEquity’s founder and vice chair, said employers are now asking for a “marriage of health savings accounts and other retirement plans.”

Having the accounts managed by the same folks that manage the company retirement plans can be a big bonus:

"Integrated retirement plan-HSA systems could make it easier for employee clients to pull the records they need to have comprehensive discussions of their finances with their advisors."

Among other advantages (follow the link for more).

A Holly Jolly Linkfest

Courtesy of FoIB Holly R.

■ Camp Fire kills carrier:

"The local Merced County Insurance Company — whose client base is overwhelmingly located in the wildfire-prone Sacramento Central Valley area — announced this week that it was closing shop because it can’t pay out the expected fire-related insurance claims."

Facing at least $64 million on claims, and with only $23 million of available assets, the company sought - and has received - bankruptcy protection. Fortunately for their clients, the California Insurance Guarantee Association (sort of like FDIC for insurance companies) will step in and cover their losses.

■ In an interesting twist, Dutch medical authorities have discovered medical ethics. Readers may recall our recent post about a Dutch doc in the dock:

"Dutch doctor faces first euthanasia prosecution"

Well, it seems that another of the country's traditions is about to expire:

"Two major Dutch hospitals say they will stop importing human body parts from American firms, which they have been doing without any regulation for a decade."

Parts is parts, as the saying goes, but apparently this practice was a bridge too far for even the Dutch:

"The move comes amid investigations by U.S. law enforcement into some so-called body brokers - companies that obtain the dead, often through donation, dissect them and sell the parts for profit. "

More details at the link.

■  The Much Vaunted National Health Service© is also in the news for coming clean on their own little shanda:

"The family of a former soldier who took his own life have won a six-figure payout after NHS chiefs admitted a catalogue of failings in his care."

The 29 year old paratrooper, Aidan Knight, had served in Iraq for half a decade. He finally bailed, having "seen too much death." He'd been trying to get professional counseling for two months, unsuccessfully. In a case of "too little, too late," the MVNHS© has apologized and cut a cheque.

Better than nothing, one supposes.

Friday, December 07, 2018

Pearl Harbor Day 2018

77 years ago today:

Thursday, December 06, 2018

DPC & HSA: A Contrarian's View

We're big fans of Health Savings Accounts and, more specifically, of true catastrophic major medical plans, which would be ideally suited for "wrapping around" Direct Primary Care subscriptions. Currently, DPC fees are not eligible for HSA reimbursement, and there are a lot of folks (myself included) who would like to see that corrected.

On the other hand, it turns out that what seems like a simple idea may not, in fact, be such a slam-dunk:

"A quick analysis of this bill by DPC docs was startling. This “simple fix” was suddenly no longer simple, and it wasn’t really a fix at all."

This was in response to new legislation, called the Primary Care Enhancement Act (PCEA), that has been bandied about the hallowed halls of Congress for a little while. Once it finally got through that meat-grinder, what came out was a stripped down, essentially useless bit of fluff without real-world application or benefit:

"DPC agreements could only include services represented by codes for “evaluation and management” office visits (CPT 99211-5). That means that Pap tests, wellness exams, simple in-office testing, strep tests, urinalysis, EKGs or any office-based procedures would need to be excluded."

Ooops. Again, the goal was to make more widely available a model that took obviously non-insurance services (pap smears, physicals, etc) out of the bloated (and unnecessarily expensive) ObamaPlans and put them back where they belonged: with the patient. By then allowing these fees to be run through one's HSA (just like contact lens solution and baby sunscreen) one's net cost is then reduced, making this an even more affordable option.

Alas and alack, it appears that this is not to be:

"The bill fixes the wrong Internal Revenue Code ... it makes DPC an exempted health plan ... [which] creates conflict in the 25 states that passed legislation declaring DPC is not a health."

/sigh

And that just scratches the surface of what's wrong with this ill-advised effort. Do click through for more gory details.

[Hat Tip: Dr Lee Gross]

Wednesday, December 05, 2018

Medicare4All: An Economics Lesson

From our friend Michael Bertau:

[click to embiggen]

This in response to a request for a comparison of Medicare reimbursement levels to commercial (private sector) carriers.

It's a very useful way to visualize what would happen under even the most rosy of M4A scenarios; that is, what physician in their right mind would agree to take that kind of financial haircut?

As Michael goes on to explain, "[i]t's more of a local question anyway. We've got quite a few safety net hospitals in our networks, for example, who are spending 70%+ of their bed/days on Medicaid/Medicare. That's quite a big hole in their finances to fill with private pay."

In layman's terms, it means that the current (imperfect at best) system is currently bailing out the gummint-run one. What happens when that "safety net" goes away?

And as long as we're piling on, there's this. According to the gentleman who actually did the study that's received the most attention:

"It is likely that the actual cost of M4A would be substantially greater than these estimates, which assume significant administrative and drug cost savings under the plan, and also assume that health care providers operating under M4A will be reimbursed at rates more than 40 percent lower than those currently paid by private health insurance.”

Oh.

[Hat Tip for Meratus link: Leo Perez]

Tuesday, December 04, 2018

Tuesday Linkfest

■ Just a thought in clarification of Justice Roberts' ObamaTax observation:

[click to embiggen]


I'd never seen it explained that way before, but that is, in fact, pitch perfect.

■ Harv Randecker (of the National Association of Alternative Benefits Consultants) alerts us to some interesting HSA news:

"Disenrollment from HSA-Eligible Health Plans Increases Employer Health Benefit Costs"

That is, deleting these types of plans actually increases ESI (Employer Sponsored Insurance) costs:

"There is evidence that individuals who disenrolled from HSA-eligible health plans were more likely to have certain health conditions than those who remained enrolled in HSA-eligible health plans"

But is the cart pulling the horse?

"Individuals with multiple conditions were even more likely to disenroll"

It's certainly a possibility.

■ This is interesting: you know all those GoFundMe campaigns to help raise money for folks facing catastrophic medical bills? Well, FoIB Rob M warns the folks behind them to tread carefully:

"[M]any people on ACA exchange policies likely also utilize GoFundMe and other "Crowdsourcing" tools to raise money for their medical expenses even if they also receive ACA subsidies ...  some funds raised via GoFundMe accounts counted as taxable income*, that means they also may* count against your ACA subsidy eligibility." [emphasis in original]

That is, if you're worried about clawback (and you should be), then you need to be aware of this potential money trap.

And by the way, great catch there by our friend Charles Gaba.

Monday, December 03, 2018

Chag Chanukah Sameyach!

Case Study: DPC & ACA

So, working on an interesting, perhaps one-of-a-kind case:

Sally, 62 years young, has a very limited income, a few meds, and a need for health insurance. Fortunately, she qualifies for a substantial subsidy: so substantial, in fact, that one of the plans would cost her $0 in premiums [ed: Hi, Jeff!]. On the other hand, that plan has a substantial out-of-pocket liability of its own, to the tune of $7900, which represents a rather significant portion of her income were she to encounter a major, catastrophic expense.

And speaking of catastrophic expenses, one of the problems with the Direct Primary Care model has been the lack of plans to provide coverage for major claims (eg heart attacks and cancer treatment). On the other hand, it does offer affordable primary care (of course), and often includes deeply discounted prescription drug costs.

Well, it turns out that we may have our first legitimate "you got my DPC in my ACA" case:

We checked DPC Frontiers, and it turns out there are a couple of practices located near Sally, and with affordable rates (about $100/month). Coupled with that "free" ACA plan to act as the DPC "wrap," it looks like we have a winner:

►Catastrophic coverage in case she gets hit by a bus, or cancer
►Not defined by or limited to in-network doc's (other than, perhaps, specialists), and so not deterred by narrow networks
►Perhaps my biggest DPC bugaboo is unnecessary (and costly) duplication of coverage, which this basically resolves
►From what I have gathered, DPC doc's also have access to low(er) cost prescription meds, which obviates the need to ACA-plan rx coverage
Seems like a win-win to me.

Unfortunately, of course, this will continue to be the exception, rather than the rule, until we get true catastrophic plans back.


►