Amazing:
And it's worked so well with people insurance.
Actually, let's take this to its logical conclusion: since pet insurance falls under the category of P&C, not life and health, this same logic would dictate that auto insurers could no longer deny coverage to folks who've just totaled their uninsured cars, or home insurance to those whose houses are currently on fire.
What could possibly go wrong?
These are, to be sure, excellent points: After all, fair is fair."A bill being considered in New York would make it illegal for pet insurers to deny coverage on the basis of preexisting conditions."— Chris Pope (@CPopeHC) August 24, 2018
Surely a mandate, subsidies, and ban on cheaper alternative sources of care for relatively-healthy pets would be needed to make this work? https://t.co/vJbZh3ORFd
And it's worked so well with people insurance.
Actually, let's take this to its logical conclusion: since pet insurance falls under the category of P&C, not life and health, this same logic would dictate that auto insurers could no longer deny coverage to folks who've just totaled their uninsured cars, or home insurance to those whose houses are currently on fire.
What could possibly go wrong?
Posts
