Well at least they're consistent: The Much Vaunted National Health System© seems hell-bent on applying the same (dubious) health care standards on helpless infants as vulnerable seniors:
"Sick children are being discharged from [MVNHS©] hospitals to die at home or in hospices on controversial ‘death pathways'"
What they're talking about there is the Liverpool Pathway, about which we've written pretty extensively in recent weeks (for example: here and here). Typically, the LP had been used todispose of decrease treatment for the elderly, since the MVNHS© had already been doing a bang-up job killing off post-birth-aborting children.
One can see their point, of course: much more efficient to combine the two programmes, and the Pathway has already proven quite helpful in reducing health care expenditures (well, health care, anyway) for seniors. We'd best be paying attention to this ourselves, since the ObamaTax is our version of that vaunted system.
Sweet dreams.
"Sick children are being discharged from [MVNHS©] hospitals to die at home or in hospices on controversial ‘death pathways'"
What they're talking about there is the Liverpool Pathway, about which we've written pretty extensively in recent weeks (for example: here and here). Typically, the LP had been used to
One can see their point, of course: much more efficient to combine the two programmes, and the Pathway has already proven quite helpful in reducing health care expenditures (well, health care, anyway) for seniors. We'd best be paying attention to this ourselves, since the ObamaTax is our version of that vaunted system.
Sweet dreams.
Posts
