Thursday, February 21, 2019

Attention Gamers! Clock is ticking...

Our friends at Fat Dragon Games have launched their newest Kickstarter, and there's less than a week left to get in on it:

"Printable Miniatures is a collection of fantasy miniatures designed to 3D print without slicer supports."

Amazing!

Even if you're just considering the world of 3D printing [ed: BTW, a fantastic printer runs about $230], would be a great idea to get in on this for when you do pull that trigger.

Math is hard

To wit:
And by "scandalously" Mr K means "by an order of magnitude:"

"The fact that the CBO assumed 14 million could lose coverage mainly due to the elimination of mandate penalties helped kill the effort to repeal and replace Obamacare."

Uh, no: that falls 100% on the feckless GOP "majority."

Still, it's worth noting that the reality turned out to be a lot less of a big deal than the projections, and doubtless played at least some role in the mid-terms.

But that's not even the best part (for certain vales of "best"). No, the best part is this:

"... actuaries for the [CMMS] ... estimated that the elimination of the individual mandate would have a significantly smaller impact than the CBO has long estimated. Specifically, the CMS report revealed that 2.5 million more people would go without insurance in 2019 due to the repeal of the individual mandate's penalties, and the impact would be "smaller" thereafter."

In marked contrast  to the 13 or 14 thousand folks the CBO "guesstimated." Close enough for government work!

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Nectar of the Gods: Lagniappe

Almost exactly a month ago, we notified readers of a (ghoulish?) new anti-aging technique:

"A controversial startup that charges $8,000 to fill your veins with young blood to 'defeat aging' now claims to be up and running in 5 cities across the US"

At the time, we also noted that there was scant (ie "zero") scientific evidence backing up that rather extravagant claim. But: no harm, no foul, right?

Well, not so fast there Dr. Acula:

"The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is warning against buying young people’s blood in an attempt to fight aging and other diseases."

Now notice they're not saying that this is potentially harmful (and, of course, they're not saying it's not, either), but the Feds are concerned that folks may be sweet-talked into spending thousands of dollars on junk science.

Caveat emptor.

[Hat Tip: FoIB Holly R]

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Interesting AutoGraphic

Our friends at the Insurance Information Institute have provided us with this handy (and helpful) visual guide to how your car insurance rates are determined:

[click to embiggen]

Monday, February 18, 2019

Medicare Advantage Plans are Like a Store Credit Card

Why are Medicare Advantage plans like a department store credit card? Before BankAmericard and Master Charge department stores like Sears, J C Penney, Macy's, etc had their own store credit cards. You could get what you want at Sears with your Sears card but don't try to use it at J C Penney's.

Original Medicare is accepted almost everywhere, but not so for your Advantage plan insurance card.



Georgia Medicare Expert explains Advantage plans like you have never heard before.

#MedicareAdvantage #OriginalMedicare #GeorgiaMedicareExpert

Friday, February 15, 2019

It's all so incenstuous: Redux

Just over 3 years ago, we noted the revolving door between the government and the insurance business:

"As regular readers know, AHIP (the health insurance industry's lobbying organization) has been on-board Team O'Care since Day One. What folks may not know is just how deep the ties run between the administration, major labor unions and the insurance industry."

We mentioned several folks specifically, including one who went from the AFL-CIO to AHIP, and then on to running EmblemHealth in New York.

We also pointed to "the lovely and talented Marilyn Tavenner, who came to AHIP directly from her previous gig as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services."

Notice a pattern here?

Well, the other day the industry news reported breathlessly on the objections of the current Keystone State Insurance Commissioner to Short Term Medical (STM) plans:
Here's what she had to say:

"One big problem with expanding consumer use of short-term health insurance is that consumers may have no good way to know what a policy will really cover."

Well for one thing, this is true of every insurance policy of every type: who actually reads them? And whatever happened to personal responsibility? It's true that STM's are underwritten, and don't over pre-existing conditions, maternity or routine physicals.

On the other hand, they offer a much less expensive alternative to ObamaPlans, and generally have significantly lower out-of-pocket maximums, to boot.

On the gripping hand: they appear to be a threat to ObmaCare, since lots of folks have figured out that they are an efficient, lower cost alternative.

Which is a problem for O'Care proponents.

Which brings us back to Ms Altman, who, it turns out, has a vested interest in curtailing the flight of folks from ACA to the short term market. As I pointed out on Twitter, "Ms. Altman worked at the U.S. Department of [HHS] for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, where she developed policy and facilitated implementation of the Affordable Care Act. No vested interest here."

And then co-blogger Patrick chimed in with even more helpful information: turns out, she's also the daughter of current Kaiser Family Foundation President Drew Altman (KFF has been a consistent and vocal ACA supporter).

Hunh.

Thursday, February 14, 2019

A Health Insurance ValDay card

From frequent foil Sarah Kliff:


Wednesday, February 13, 2019

The Mask Slips

Yikes!


Everything Old is New Again: MEWA edition

It's been a while since we discussed MEWAs (Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangement), but this type of plan (along with AHPs and self-funding arrangements) have become hot (again).

Why's that?

Well, primarily because they offer smaller employers the ability to (potentially) save a lot of money on their group health insurance plans.

And how does that work?

Mostly because, unlike ACA group plans, they're medically underwritten, so relatively healthy groups can benefit from rates that reflect the actual risk, instead of Community Rating, which basically dictates ACA plan rates, which subsidizes unhealthy groups at the expense of healthier ones.

And why are you bringing this up now, Henry?

Well, because I recently underwent training to be able to actually sell these plans. The session I attended was for Anthem's version, and took about an hour. The plans themselves are pretty much "off the shelf," with a variety of options and plan designs, including HSAs. From the employer side, there's a bit more paperwork, including something called a Form 5500, "an important compliance, research, and disclosure tool for the Department of Labor, a disclosure document for plan participants and beneficiaries, and a source of information and data for use by other Federal agencies."

From the employee side, it looks just like any other group health plan: you get an ID card and a website "portal" that lets you track expenses, find providers, all the same bells and whistles as ACA plans, but at (potentially) substantial savings.

Of course, there's also the possibility that the rate could could come back higher than an ACA plan (a group can't be declined for health reasons, but it can be rated up), but in that case they're no worse off than before, it just means they're "stuck" with their current plan for a while.

Will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Yanking the teeth from the MVNHS©

Specifically:



Seems that the Medicare4All folks could be taking a lesson from our Cousins Across the Pond:

"... news was breaking on the other side of England of the desperation of David Woodhouse ... who claimed he had resorted to extracting one of his own teeth with pliers after a fruitless search of up to 100 miles to find an NHS dentist."

This is a lesson in what happens when the government runs health "care."

But hey: Free!

Or maybe not:

"There is a growing sense that NHS dentistry is at ... a tipping point ... the “high street” dental sector as a whole remains robust, with forecast annual growth of 2%-2.5% over the next three years, this is down to expanding private care."

Yeah, that bites.

Monday, February 11, 2019

Saturday, February 09, 2019

Cycling for Survivors

Cancer survivors, that is. FoIB Meredith L is asking for our help:

"Rare cancer research is underfunded, leaving people fighting these cancers with few options — sometimes none. But I’m working to change this by riding with Cycle for Survival.

I’m hoping to surpass my fundraising goal and with your help we can make a difference in the lives of rare cancer patients everywhere. 100% of the money raised through my ride directly funds rare cancer research led by Memorial Sloan Kettering within six months of the events.
Every donation counts! Please consider making a tax-deductible gift online today."

For those so inclined, the the link is here.

Thank you!

Friday, February 08, 2019

Belated Blogiversary

And once again, I let our blogiversary - #14, this time - slip by without notice. The actual date was January 31st.

/sigh

A HUGE Thank You to our readers and commenters, and especially to my fantastic co-bloggers.

Here's to the next 14.

Long time, First time

I've been in this business for almost 4 decades, and pretty sure just sold my first Juvenile SPWL plan.

And so...?

Well, SPWL stands for Single Premium Whole Life, and it's a way to (inexpensively) pre-pay a life insurance plan. Now, it's not for everyone (no product is), but in the right circumstances, it can be most useful.

As in this case.

I recall (vaguely) from Insurance 101 that parents buying their grandkids life insurance is a great idea (again often, not always) and I've had a few clients do that. But they were (as far as I can recall), of the "pay-as-you-go" variety. In this case, Gramps paid a little less than $1,900 and his new grandbaby is insured for $25,000 for the rest of his life. And, as FoIB Jeff M points out, who knows, this may turn put to be the only plan the little guy will ever be able to buy.

So, what's the advantage of a Single Pay plan? Well for starters, Junior there will never have to pay any premiums. Plus, it's at his age 0, meaning rates go up from here. And, of course, what a loving gift from his Grandfather.

Now the downside is that these plans are by definition "Modified Endowment Contracts" (MEC's), which means that the cash value that will begin to accrue won't have all of the tax advantages of a "regular" plan. But since that's not a goal here, no harm or foul.

Oh, why does one buy life insurance on a child?

Well, for a variety of reasons., For one, as noted above, it guarantees that they'll always have at least some life insurance protection, no matter what life eventually throws at them.

And, as co-blogger Bob is fond of noting, it's really more about buying time; that is, time for the parents to mourn without having to worry about losing dollars from missing work.

Pretty powerful incentive, that.

Thursday, February 07, 2019

Not So Peachy Anthem/BX News

Via email from a reader:

"DOSS LAW FIRM FILES CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT ON BEHALF OF THOUSANDS OF GEORGIA HEALTHCARE CONSUMERS MISLED BY ANTHEM “DECEPTIVE MARKETING SCHEME

Well bless their hearts.

Do go on:

"Thousands of Georgia consumers were misled during the 2018 open enrollment period by “misrepresentations and omissions” from Anthem, Inc./Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc. (Anthem) when they were told they would continue to have access to the doctors and specialists of Georgia’s largest health care provider."

That's according to a class action lawsuit filed yesterday by what appears to be a fairly large Peach State law firm. At issue is what appears to have been a serious case of bait-and-switch, where, at renewal time, Anthem assured folks that certain providers would indeed remain in-network, allegedly knowing this to have been, er, incorrect.

I can certainly see where folks would feel blindsided, especially if they'd been shopping for coverage based substantively on keeping their docs.

Be interesting to watch this play out.

[Hat Tip: Whitney D]

Wednesday, February 06, 2019

Pension Max: A Primer


Been working with a client on how best to handle her upcoming retirement income options, and realized that the most comprehensive post I ever did on this was actually at my old Answers.com gig.

So, since that's been memory-holed by TBTB, here's a reprise:


*Summary

One of the challenges when planning for one's retirement is balancing benefits with the risk of death. Pension Maximization is a useful tool for solving this dilemma.



*Intro

In planning for retirement, we often have choices about how we'd like to receive our post-employment income. Typically, these pension plans will offer various dollar amount levels based on how long we expect to live, and how long we'd like to receive that income. The challenge is that we don't know for sure how long that might be.



*Choices, choices

So your retirement plan offers you, for example, two choices. Under Plan A, you receive $1,000 per month for as long as you live. At your demise, though, the payments stop.



Or perhaps you'd like to make sure your spouse continued to receive some income after you're gone. In that case, perhaps you'd like Plan B, in which you receive only $500 a month, hut your widow or widower would continue to receive a benefit after you're gone.



But what if there was a way to have the best of both options, high income in a perpetual stream? There is, and it's called Pension Maximization, or Pension Max.



*When do I choose?

The first challenge is that Pension Max requires some advance planning and forethought. It wouldn't do to wait until one actually retires, because at that point all the choices have been made. Ideally, one would start considering options years beforehand. 



*What are my options?

This will vary from plan to plan, company to company, but generally fall into one of two broad categories. The first is called the Single Life option. Under this scenario, you'd receive the highest monthly income because the plan is paying only you, and you've agreed to have payments stop at your death. This might make sense if one is single, or if one's spouse has sufficient income to make up for any shortfall.



The other category is called the Joint and Survivor option and, as its name implies, covers both your own life as well as your spouse's (or other designated beneficiary). The benefit to this method is that at least a portion of the retirement income continues on after your death, although at a reduced level. The major drawback is that the cost of doing so is a significantly smaller retirement income than the Single Life method.



*So what's "The Third Option"

Under the Pension Max method, one chooses the Single Life retirement income option, and then buys a life insurance policy to guarantee that the surviving spouse continues to receive the income that will be cut off at one's death. It's not a terribly complicated arrangement, but does require a certain amount of math.



*How does it work?

Let's assume that your Single Life option income amount would be $4,000 a month, or $48,000 a year. Let’s further assume that the plan administrators use 75% as their survivor’s benefit cost. That is, if you elect the Survivor Benefit option, you'd only receive $3,000 a month, or $36,000 a year. That's a cost of $12,000 a year. Over the course of even 20 years, that's a net reduction of almost a quarter of a million dollars.



Under the Pension Max option, you'd take a fraction of that lost income and use it to purchase a life insurance policy sufficient to produce an income stream equal to the Single Life option even after you've died.



*Conclusion

Making informed and economically rational choices in planning for retirement income can be challenging. Using Pension Maximization to insure the greatest possible retirement income stream for both you and your surviving spouse can make it easier.



*Callout

According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, two-thirds of American workers expect to have to work during retirement.

Tuesday, February 05, 2019

*Really* fast claim




Funny because it's true: my eldest is in a Physics PhD program that collaborates with the folks who run the LHC. Heh.

Monday, February 04, 2019

Fraudulent (sub)contractor tricks

But not what you might expect. Thanks to FoIB Jeff M, we get the sad tale of a mid-50's contractor looking to score some additional cash via his customer's pop machine's ice-maker:



ProTip: Camera's are everywhere people!

Friday, February 01, 2019

WCL: An update

Regular readers may recall this past summer's story about the Cincinnati-area family that managed to 'defraud' West Coast Life:

"Mason family who faked life insurance policies, bought Bentley convertible, pleads guilty"

[ed: is it really "fraud" if the carrier's underwriter is asleep at the switch? Isn't there some shared culpability here?]

But that was then, and this is now, and FoIB Holly R tips us that there's been some closure in the case:

"A Mason man was sentenced Thursday to more than three years in prison for conspiring to launder about $3 million in proceeds fraudulently obtained from a life insurance company. 

His wife and daughter were also sentenced on one count of money laundering conspiracy."

The family must now return (what's left of) the money, and give up their newly purchased house.

Seems fair.

Scary Health "Care" Tricks

And for once, it's not about The MVNHS© or CanuckCare©, but in our own Golden State:

"A California woman is accused of posing as a pharmacist and handling out nearly a million prescriptions before she was caught"

Turns out, she'd fraudulently claimed to have graduated from pharmacy school, and then "borrowed" the licenses of two other actual pharmacists with names similar to her own.

Yikes.

And Ms Le isn't the only one in trouble:

"The [
California Board of Pharmacy] is looking at revoking Walgreens’s pharmacy license at the stores where Le worked. Walgreens couldn’t tell the Board if they’d requested or reviewed Le’s pharmacist license and couldn’t furnish her employment application during the agency’s investigation."

Ooops.

Seems like maybe they should be working on their employment screening process (although one wonders if there's a bit of a PC angle there, as well).

One wonders how much actual damage she might have done, though: there's no mention in the article of any pending civil litigation from her "patients."

Still my absolute favorite take-away is this:

"During questioning, Le told the Board “me and my son would be very grateful if you could just forget about this.”

I bet.